This should’ve always been the case.

  • jabjoe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 months ago

    But what of those not elected or in public office? Farage for example. He stopped being a MEP and never has been elected or appointed since. But he is still out spouting lies.

    • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Under the proposals it would be a criminal offence for a member of the Senedd, or a candidate for election to the Senedd, to wilfully, or with intent to mislead, make or publish a statement that is known to be false or deceptive.”

      I think candidate for election would cover that.

      • jabjoe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        It would now, but he’s just been a bloody agitant for a number of years.

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even if this manages to pass, it’d only apply to those currently in or candidating for the Senedd. This wouldn’t affect the UK government (and thus Farage) at all, even if he were attempting to get re-elected.

      • jabjoe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Obviously, but it’s an example of a lying agitator it wouldn’t deal with.

          • jabjoe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think it’s a step.

            We also need to enforce existing news laws on any media outlet that calls itself “news”.

            There is so much disinformation right now and there will probably be multiple solutions needed.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Most one could do is go after them once in office if they lied whilst campaigning for election to that office. You could maybe go after them even if they don’t win that election.

      It probably needs to be done as a strict obligation to not say anything in office or when campaigning which is not verifiably true.

      Would also need to be backed with hefty fines on parties if one of their candidates are proven to have lied, or if the party spread that lie.

      Tbh any version would be very hard to get right, and if it isn’t robust the likes of Farage will use it as yet another tool of discord & disruption as they attack democratic institutions and the rule of law.

      • jabjoe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think politics and political falsehoods, aren’t just by professional politicians. It’s part of wider issue of misinformation spreaders.

        • apis@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Of course, but that’s considerably harder to address via criminal law.

          Going after people in office (& people running for office & political parties) for misleading the public is much easier, as you can impose a duty on them.