When I first started using Linux 15 years ago (Ubuntu) , if there was some software you wanted that wasn’t in the distro’s repos you can probably bet that there was a PPA you could add to your system in order to get it.

Seems that nowadays this is basically dead. Some people provide appimage, snap or flatpak but these don’t integrate well into the system at all and don’t integrate with the system updater.

I use Spek for audio analysis and yesterday it told me I didn’t have permission to read a file, I a directory that I owned, that I definitely have permission to read. Took me ages to realise it was because Spek was a snap.

I get that these new package formats provide all the dependencies an app needs, but PPAs felt more centralised and integrated in terms of system updates and the system itself. Have they just fallen out of favour?

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    Oh I’m not defending PPAs at all, I’m glad we’ve moved past them, I just thought it was a Debian tech that got boosted by Ubuntu. I see I was in error. Thanks for clarifying!

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Debian focuses on stability. They tell you not to add any extra repos ever as it introduces untested software.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Encouraging something and disabling something are two different things. They have Flatpak in stable, which is untested software. That’s not why they didn’t use PPAs.