• ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dealers will install a tube to let gasoline flow away from hot surfaces to the ground below the vehicle.

    Let’s just throw it on the ground, definitely a better solution than making sure it won’t leak

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    7 months ago

    They’re not fixing the leaks, they’re making the car detect when it starts spraying gasoline inside the engine compartment so it will enter limp mode before a fire starts.

    The driver can then push their disabled car to the side of the road, and assuming they weren’t killed in traffic, then Ford will replace the faulty injector.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Are you sure? It’sa Ford after all. Limp mode could mean a hammer drops from under the dash, smashes one of your knees, and puts you in limp mode.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    "Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don’t do one.

    Woman on plane: Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?

    Narrator: You wouldn’t believe.

    Woman on plane: Which car company do you work for?

    Narrator: A major one."

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    GDI engines that need to run the fuel to the injectors at over 2,000 psi is just stupid. Using that much pressure for such a marginal gain in efficiency from other engines that only need like 50 psi.

    2,000 psi is like a guarantee that at some point in that vehicles life there’s going to be fuel leaks and problems. Ever see a firetruck shooting that giant stream of water from the end of its ladder? That’s only 80 psi.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Direct injected cars are nothing new. Diesels run their injectors much higher than 2000psi for hundreds of thousands kilometers. Ford is just shit at engineering.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Don’t try and bring diesel into this. They’re pretty different. It also doesn’t cause nearly the fire risk when they leak some fuel.

        Also, they absolutely leak fuel. I’ve seen loads of diesels with fuel leaks (I drive a lot of diesels for work). But like I said, them leaking a bit isn’t really a cause to sound the alarm bells for a fire, cause diesel fuel isn’t a risk like that.

        • Gingernate@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          High pressure side leaks? If a common rail diesel has a high pressure leak the engine will most likely shut down due to pressure loss.

            • Gingernate@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Right, and on newer emissions systems the engines use the high pressure to help with more complete combustion allowing for lower soot, meaning less DPF issues. While this does cause higher NOx , we are able to clean it up with SCR and flowing more DEF. Ford is being lazy on this, but the issue is not high pressure. I also understand the differences between gasoline and diesel, and again, Ford could develope a system that does not fail, and then dumps gasoline on the ground hahaha. I’m saying this as a master diesel engine tech with 12 years of experience. I’m not rooting my own horn, but just letting people know I do have industry experience.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Gas is a type of fuel…

            And squares are a type of rectangle, but rectangles aren’t all squares.

            Diesel fuel isn’t gasoline. They have different properties and Diesel isn’t nearly as flammable.

            • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Just because it’s not nearly as flammable doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have the exam inherent risks especially when you end up having it come out under high pressure it’s going to try an atomize into a fine spray it most certainly can be a fire risk.

              • Gingernate@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes. There are huge risks. I have seen several diesel powered class 8 trucks burn and catch fire due to fuel leaks. It’s not very common at all, but it does happen. Ford is not fixing the issue when they could. The fuel system probably needs to be re engineered, but high pressure is not the issue

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            But diesel isn’t a type of gas, so you can be a bit ambiguous calling gas “fuel”, you can’t call diesel “gas”.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    ah yes. Ford and saving money and fires…

    The article says that this is an extension of a recall from 2022 for the same problem, and that Ford says replacement parts are available, but its odd to me that they wouldn’t just replace them. I guess we’re still on risk calculation vs people freaking over a known reason that their car could catch on fire

    • sepulcher@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yes. Human lives are just another data point for these companies.

      If it’s cheaper to have people die than to make things safely, we all know what they’re going to do.

      The solution is to create penalties that outweigh the profits.

  • Null User Object@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Me (while reading about the “fix” in the article): That’s just a Band-aid!

    The article:

    Michael Brooks, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Auto Safety, called Ford’s remedy for the fuel leaks a “Band-aid type recall” and said the company is trying to avoid the cost of repairing the fuel injectors.

    Me: That’s what I just said!

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Do not buy American cars.

    I honestly don’t know the reason, but they have made hot garbage for over 2 decades.

    The interiors look like prison cells and the QA is nonexistent.

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    GM had a recall on their Epsilon extended platform that didn’t fix the problem either. Wires would corrode due to no seals and proximity to HVAC. Safety systems would go off line, brake lights would get stuck on. A Colorado woman actually drove off a mountain because of this defect.

    Still not fixed to this day, as the correct fix would involve replacing a computer module in millions of cars with one that has a weathertight interface. US automakers always get the laziest of passes.

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Does widdle baby American corporations need the bail out bottle?

    Smells like no one changed the diaper after decades of the US auto industry sitting it’s pants.