• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yay, a small portion of the taxes that the wealthy like her should have paid over the years that could have gone to the same thing but based on the decisions of society and not dependent on one wealthy person!

  • twinnie
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I knew when I read these comments people would be criticising her.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Giving one single person power like this, is not right. You get to pick and choose what is important and what isn’t. That is why we pay taxes so it can help more people in a wide range of programs.

    Just like their drive to rid the world of Malaria. Organizations reported Malaria as not an issue in their area but due to the money coming from them, they had to switch their focus to Malaria.

    Plus, lets not forget how tuwy mad their mpney by destroying other companies and creating a monopoly. In close meetings, these people are not fighting to be taxed. They are buy politicians and protecting their wealth.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, when you can’t hide your side piece and your relationship with Epstein goes public, can you really blame her

  • ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Article doesn’t list a single charity or organization that she is “supporting”. Just a vague “reproductive rights” name for the headlines. Launder it harder Melinda.

  • LordTrychon@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Predictable comment section is predictable.

    Should have created a charity to give out knee high socks or something, I guess. I dunno.