I want to see if they make a show of it like they did last week, also if Jon Moss also comes to our dressing room to apologise.

    • coys25@lemmy.worldEnglish
      61·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, even though slow motion makes it look worse, I was shocked that it wasn’t given in real time. But the commentary team was convinced that it was just a natural body position. I continue to have no idea what constitutes a handball in the box.

    • elroon@lemmy.oneEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      If it was the other way around and wasn’t given for Spurs, I’d be livid, not gonna lie.

    • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      42·
      1 year ago

      Seems a natural position to me, no movement to try to swat the ball or anything. I think any handball in the box when your hand is over your elbow should be a penalty, but that is not the current rule.

        • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think so, I believe it applies to any call where the decision is whether the handball was a penalty or not:

          “An arm extended away from the body makes that body bigger, in an unnatural position,” explains Mike Riley, Managing Director of Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the referees’ body.

          “If the ball strikes that arm, particularly if it is blocking a shot on goal, there is a greater likelihood we will penalise that.”

          So the way I see it, his right arm was in a natural postion, so no penalty.

          source

          • kameecoding@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
            11·
            1 year ago

            then that’s a terrible call, it blocks a shot on goal, arms is way up, by this logic there is no longer any need to tuck your hands in because that’s unnatural so everything else is natural.

            THey are trying to make rules more “fair” and shit but all they are achieving is shit subjective calls.