• Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Their only dignified escape from the conservative nightmare is by their own hand. Nothing good in history has ever come from conservatism. Nothing.

    Conservatism is a plague of oppression and death. And the plague is spreading.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What if they don’t have the power to topple their oppressors without foreign intervention?

      It seems that’s the case for Iran.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I agree. A revolution would be a violent and bloody one. I worry it would still be ineffective. Conservatism is like cancer. The treatment is deadly for both the disease and its victim.

      • TimeNaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Foreign infervention is almost always the worst possible option.

        It only makes sense in the case of active mass genocides (think WWII, Cambodia or Serbia). Toppling an oppresive but stable regime through foreign power always ends in destabilisation and even more suffering to the people.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Foreign infervention is almost always the worst possible option.

          Agreed.

          Anyone who suggests otherwise needs to look at the very long history of foreign attempts at “intervention” in Afghanistan.

          The country was left worse than it was after each of those many failed attempts.

        • JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Serbia? Serbia (SR Yugoslavia) did a lot of nasty shit, but 99’ intervention was not a product of a genocide, let alone a massive one.

          UN ruling in question, BBC article.

          Crimes against humanity and war crimes did take place, it said, but “the exactions committed by Milosevic’s regime cannot be qualified as criminal acts of genocide, since their purpose was not the destruction of the Albanian ethnic group… but its forceful departure from Kosovo”.

          Srebreica was a genocide, but was not perpotrated by actual Serbia, if it makes any difference…

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right.

          Let me know when these problems get solved doing something I don’t suggest.

      • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        …wasn’t foreign intervention the primary reason why Iran is in this mess in the first place?

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That means it’s impossible to intervene with positive results.

          Is that what you’re implying? Just say it, lol. But you won’t because you know how stupid it sounds.

  • AndreaHill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Latest: The Taliban have decreed that any woman caught attempting suicide will be put to death.

    • 3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong but don’t some JudeoIslamic factions already punish suicide with death?

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes. Though it’s not really as hypocritical as it seems at first glance.

        Assume you view suicide as being punished with eternal torment.

        Someone wants to kill themselves, but, if you kill them instead it isn’t a mortal sin.

        From your moral framework the execution is now a mercy. They no longer suffer, in this life or the next.

        Ya know, if you believe in sky daddies and whatnot.

        • pixeltree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean, even without the religious aspect, that might be kinda nice

          “We caught you trying to kill yourself through some nasty means, here, have some state sponsored painless nitrogen to breathe”

          I mean setting aside the horrible power it would give the gov, it’s a really funny image of someone being talked down from suicide by jumping into getting professional suicide help so they can do it easier

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Suicide, really. That’s the last thing you should try. You realize that suicide’s a criminal offense. In less enlightened times, they’d have hung you for it.

        – Peter Cook, Bedazzled (1968)

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m sure some have tried, and succeeded, and I’m sure some have tried and failed.

      I’m betting what follows for both situations is making these women take their lives first instead.

      • Damage@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        What follows is death anyway, might as well make a bit of difference in the process

        • mzesumzira@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          While I agree, there may be a difference in the level of suffering they’d need to endure before death

  • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “females made up more than three-quarter of recorded suicide deaths and treated survivors”

    Sounds like women are basically enslaved. I can understand that some slaves decide that death is better.

    Fun place to live. /s

  • CapnMoisesBKind@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Disturbing yes but not entirely surprising. I hope the Taliban get their just dues for what their doing to women soon.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The army that folded in two days after 20 years of time wasted trying to make a horse drink.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s the middle east, they’re not “minorities” in their own fucking country lol

            Armed the women? Certainly would have worked if they’d been willing to fight, probably would have only driven more Afghani army into the Taliban’s ranks though. Considering even the non-extremists in the area don’t want women equal to men at this point.

            Sharia law is the problem, we will never have a functional middle east until religious authoritarianism stops being the actual written law. Problem is most of them are comfortable in their current existence and have no reason to change. Any change we suggest or offer will just be met with “these evil westerners are trying to destroy our faith!”

              • Firemyth@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                You are incomprehensible. Dude was saying there is no way to help them. Their own army gave up in 2 weeks even after being trained for 2 decades by a professional army.

                You came. in and said “don’t hold your breathe”… for whatever reason… hold our breathe for what? No one mentioned anything to be waiting for…

                • bobman@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Lol, what?

                  Anyone with a middle-school reading level can understand I was saying “I won’t hold my breath for their military to help them out.”

                  “incomprehensible”, yeah, if your reading comprehension isn’t that great. Sure.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hope unfortunately doesn’t mean anything in the face of abuse.

      You either have power, or you don’t.

    • Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The only way that will happen is for the women of Afghanistan to receive the same training and equipment as the Ukrainian army are getting.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Absolutely tragic, but I probably would do the same were I forced to live the life they’re forced to with no hope of escape.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Gee, I wonder why… is it because they’re treated like property instead of people?

    • mayo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are being blocked at the border. The Taliban won’t let them leave. The ones who got out and participated in interviews (ie the ones we hear about) talk about how their families back home are being harassed, hiding.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes because that’s the easiest solution for people enduring violent oppression.

      “jUsT lEaVe!!11!”

      Yep it’s that simple. Forget your lives forget your families forget making where you live a better place JUST LEAVE! 🤓

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        No. I never said anything about anything being easy, lol.

        Do you always argue with your own made up arguments?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They should focus on leaving the country.

      Getting caught trying means lengthy torture, ending either in death or crippling injuries.

      And, because women’s movements and activities are already horribly controlled, even attempting to run is almost impossible. Getting caught is pretty much guaranteed before they get anywhere near a border.