• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Someone can correct me on this but I believe at the point in time there was no Jewish violence or mass migration so these protests were purely motivated by xenophobia.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 minutes ago

      This was 3 years after the Balfour Declaration. By 1920 figures like Ben-Gurion had already settled in Palestine. And the paramilitary predecessor to the IDF was in operation.

      Zionist terror, violence, and colonialism was well under way by 1920.

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      There has been Zionist on semite violence in the region since the early 1900s. These protests were against the planned/proposed settling of the region after Zionist terror organizations had been attacking the local Jewish and Muslim populations.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Nice find!

    A pre-emptive warning to anyone who feels the urge to bring modern politics into this comment thread - modern politics aren’t against the rules, but genocide and atrocity denial are. :)

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Oh no, if drama happens, it happens! Sooner drama than avoidance of topics, after all!

        Just wanted to give everyone a heads up in case there was any ambiguity as to whether rule 9 was going to be strictly enforced (it is).