• kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Are there actually 15K trans soldiers in the army, or is this just another number that he pulled out of his ass?

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Transgender people are significantly more likely to serve in the US military than the general US population.[178][179] According to 2014 estimates from the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Public Policy, despite the ban on military service, about 21.4% of the total transgender population in the US is estimated to have served in the military. In May 2014, an estimated 15,500 transgender individuals served on active duty or in the Guard or Reserve forces.[22] Wikipedia

      So it’s a real number he just thinks military=army like the fake loser he is.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Apparently I vastly underestimated how many people are in the US military in general.

        Transgender people are significantly more likely to serve in the US military than the general US population

        That also surprises me.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            My first inclination would not be to join an organization that has a long and notorious history of testosterone fuelled bro culture.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Don’t folks get gender affirming / plastic surgery for free or something? I think I heard it was covered because it lets military surgeons get practice for when they go work for private sector after their bit

          • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            The military and the VA offer gender affirming care, and what they offer varies.

            For instance (I’m going off memory for active duty, I got out in 2017), if you’re active duty, I believe they’ll pay for everything so long as you lay out in your Transition Plan everything you want covered and your commanding officer approves it. You need “approval” to ensure that your absence during medical recovery won’t hinder mission readiness, so basically, if you’re about to be deployed in a month for 6 months, and you’re supposed to have gender affirming surgery tomorrow with a multi-month recovery, your surgery will likely be postponed.

            The VA, which is for veterans, covers a majority of gender affirming care, but they aren’t legally allowed to cover everything. GRS/SRS is the big on, the military will cover that I believe, but the VA cannot and will not.

            With Trump coming in, I have a feeling this is all going to go away, and they’re going to use a similar approach as the Federal Minimum Drinking Age Act to basically make LGBTQ+ healthcare illegal via withholding federal funding from those states who try to continue after a federal ban. “The states can choose their drinking age gender affirming care, but those who don’t follow the federal guidelines will lose access to XYZ federal funding.”

        • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What’s even crazier is that, in the modern US military, less than 1% of the population serves in the military.

          There are also more NYPD cops than there are active duty Coast Guard personnel.