Most major car manufacturers admit they may be selling your personal information — though they are vague on the buyers, a new study finds, and half say they would share it with the government or law enforcement without a court order.

The proliferation of sensors in automobiles — from telematics to fully digitized control consoles — has made them prodigious data-collection hubs.

But drivers are given little or no control over the personal data their vehicles collect, researchers for the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation said Wednesday in their latest “Privacy Not Included” survey. Security standards are also vague, a big concern given automakers’ track record of susceptibility to hacking.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Maybe we sell it, maybe we don’t. Why do you care it’s all out there anyhow….”

    Yeah. We don’t have privacy because assholes like these own politicians and it’s big business. Does mean I don’t want it.

  • Sendbeer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spokesman Brian Weiss said that for safety reasons the group “has concerns” about letting customers completely opt out.

    God, what ass holes.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Change your cities to be human centric instead of car centric. Build bicycle lanes, Changr building zoning in suburbs so that small shops and restaurants are sprinkled thought. Invest heavily in public transportation

    Now we mostly no longer need cars. We’re healthier because we move more, we’re healthier because the air is cleaner, cities are safer and prettier, quieter, everything gets better.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conspiracy to manipulate securities that they aren’t listed in the article to begin with, I’m sure. Corporate media at work. It’s just billionaire stock holders and hedge funds back and back, and around again.

  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the newest car is even consider is 2008. Once they started putting telemetry in our cars it was inevitable that they’ll collect every possible datapoint to sell.

    I don’t get the need for any of the new features anyways. My 2004 escape does everything I need it to with absolutely no fancy electronics. The cruise control still moves the throttle pedal ffs. The stereo is a $75 dumb radio and everything else is analog.

    My next daily driver will probably be whatever I can find that’s older and fun to drive. Some of the new cars look great, especially the EVs, but I’m not willing to let them have that much data about me

  • Joshua Nozzi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Law enforcement thing doesn’t bother me. If I’m out driving around, I assume I will be tracked some way or another. Especially since I carry a smart phone with me. I have satellite connectivity to be able to lock/unlock, remote start, disable, and track the location of my car. I fully expect the telemetry to be easily accessible by Big Gubmint.

    I definitely do not consent to the resale of my information to random third parties. That bit needs to be stopped.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would hope any company I’m a customer of would at least require a warrant to release my data to law enforcement. I know I’d be disappointed in most companies, but I feel if I’m paying them, they shouldn’t concede until they are at least be required to release my data.

      EDIT: a word