Excerpt:

Prosecutors highlighted “about $10,000 — $8,000 in U.S. dollars and then $2,000 in foreign currency that was found on his person,” CNN correspondent Danny Freeman said following the court hearing.

“Also they said that he had a Faraday bag,” which blocks cell signals, a move that prosecutors alleged marked “an indication of criminal sophistication and reason they should hold him on bail,” Freeman continued.

After prosecutors made the claims, Mangione said he would like to “correct two things.”

“I don’t know where any of that money came from — I’m not sure if it was planted. And also, that bag was waterproof, so I don’t know about criminal sophistication,” the suspect said in a statement that suggested police framed him.

  • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    A lot of people on all platforms trying to explain why he kept his gun, why he was caught so easily, and most coming up with easy explanations that fit their conspiracy theories.

    The simple explanation is, he might be smarter than most, but maybe not enough to outsmart the whole NYPD police department. Maybe he kept his gun because he didn’t want to leave a trace. Maybe he wanted to get caught peacefully in a McD rather than dying in a shooting.

    Also, to those who still don’t believe he’s the killer: he is. Police don’t go capture a random dude and then plant every evidence on him “because they need a scapegoat”. There’s a whole judicial process that goes on after the arrest, and if he’s found not to be the killer, the police will have to go back to square one on a cold trail. They usually don’t want that.

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also, to those who still don’t believe he’s the killer: he is. Police don’t go capture a random dude and then plant every evidence on him “because they need a scapegoat”.

      How long have you lived in America? Have you ever heard of the Innocence Project? I mean we literally just executed a black man in Sept that was very likely innocent of the crime he was convicted of. Even the prosecutor wanted to stop the execution.

          • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I like the example you chose because the facts reported support what I’m saying: eventually, if cops get too comfy planting evidence everywhere, someone down the line is going to notice and the judge will dismiss the case.

            • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Jesus fuck, this is what Disney did to people’s minds. You’ll believe anything, as long as it ends with “…and they all lived happy ever after.”

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Police don’t go capture a random dude and then plant every evidence on him “because they need a scapegoat”.

      Google: Robert Lee Stinson

      Some dude got convicted of nothing but a “teeth mark” psudoscience BS.

      That was a low-profile case. This is a high-profile case, which has higher incentives to find a scapegoat.

      • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        High-profile case also means more scrutiny from everyone, which means there’s a bigger risk someone finds out what they did.

      • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know they do, but they usually keep it somewhat subtle because the goal is to reinforce the bad guy image of someone they already know is guilty (but can’t prove). Planting the main piece of evidence such as a gun is risky.

        • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Why? They have the entire media apparatus to whitewash their narrative, and a bunch of idiots believing it, despite how flimsy their super convenient evidence is.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      He DID outsmart the whole NYPD. The only reason he was caught was a couple of randos in a Pennsylvania McDonalds.

      Remember this bit from the Mayor?

      https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5028239-mayor-adams-says-net-is-tightening-on-unitedhealthcare-ceo-shooting-suspect/

      "When asked by a reporter if police had the suspect’s name, Adams said, “We don’t want to release that now. If you do, you’re basically giving a tip to the person we are fine with seeking, and we do not want to give him an upper hand at all. Let him continue to believe he can hide behind a mask.” "

      Yeah, turns out, they had no clue.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Police don’t go capture a random dude and then plant every evidence on him “because they need a scapegoat"

      Yikes, how cringe. And in the most public way possible. Hope you recover from this huge mistake someday soon.

      • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Don’t worry. Just like every other bootlicker on the Internet, the PTB have seen their loyalty, and shall lift them on high to live out their halcyon days in Valhalla.