• espentan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Surprisingly, I’m not shocked at all. Heck, I’m not even surprised I’m not shocked.

    • Ace
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • bigFab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apple has said it “strongly disputes” the minerals claims and that it is “deeply committed to armed conflict responsible sourcing” of minerals.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    What an incredibly PC word for BLOOD DIAMONDS! I’m sure the world will be a much safer place downplaying that or if you prefer BLOOD MINERALS. But conflict minerals doesn’t exactly sound as hostile as it should.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, they’re talking about “tin, tantalum and tungsten”, not diamonds, so that part makes sense. They did water down the title compared to the article where they describe them as “blood minerals” though, you’re right about that.