• rodbiren@midwest.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fun fact, the static generated by gamma radiation actually looks a lot like confetti with random pixels and streaks of pixels turning blue, yellow, red, green or a combination in true random fashion. I know this because I used to perform visual inspections on nuclear reactors.

      • rodbiren@midwest.social
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but only from far away. The fuel bundles sort of glow like a blue light saber. Especially the “hot” ones right after we open the head of the reactor. I worked in various BWRs domestically and a few international. I spent many hours staring into the reactor glow from up on the refuel floor waiting for other work activities to finish up so I could do mine. It’s mesmerizing to look at but it gets real burning after like 3 days.

        • Leon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          amazing. you mean like the radiation can burn your eyes if you stare too long? I’ve always wanted to see it but I doubt they let random civilians stare at active reactors

          • rodbiren@midwest.social
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            The used fuel bundles must remain under at least 6 feet of water or the whole refuel floor would start hearing their radiation badges beeping. The blue light only happens in water. In air you see nothing, I assume. By far away I mean in reactor which is like 60 or so feet underwater when the reactor cavity is flooded.

            Your eyes would burn in radiation, but the static only occurs on cameras. I think high intensity particles can cause vision abnormalities, but I think our brain is good at hiding background noise pretty good. Filling in the gaps as it were. Or the mechanism of sight just isn’t as affected as the electronics in camera sensors. Not sure on the physics of that.

          • rodbiren@midwest.social
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Scales directly with the amount of radiation present. Because the visual inspection happens in the water the radiation levels change a lot depending on where you are. Water is excellent as a radiation shield. I can’t remember the halving distance (thickness of material needed to halve the radiation levels) but an active fuel bundle only needing 6 feet to drop down to safe levels is an insane drop. Something on the order of 1000 Rad/hr or something coming off the bundles.

            • interloper@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Gotcha! I’ve always found it interesting how efficient water is at dispersing/shielding radio waves too. I believe light waves are also considered a type of radiation, but you only need a couple meters to completely block out [most] radio/ir/uv waves. Making wireless communication with things like drones or submarines very difficult.

              Ty for the reply! This entire chain has been interesting.

    • bastian_5@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doubly forbidden because it doesn’t have a lip, so it’ll get stuck. Imagine having to explain to the government why you have an orphaned source shoved up your ass.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    You sure it’s metal? Looks like a perfectly edible candy baton. Pretty sure it’ll melt your mouth. I mean, in your mouth.

  • nabuc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just sleep on it and you’ll figure it out tomorrow. Make sure to put it under your pillow though.