Apple discriminated against US citizens in hiring, DOJ says::Apple deterred US citizens from positions open to foreign workers, DOJ found.

  • mawkishdave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    And I am sure any costs Apple gets from this (legal costs and fines) will count for a small % of the profits they made from this practice.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m going to play the devil’s advocate here and point out that Green Card holders being chained to an employer is not Apple’s fault.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s a good point, our stupid federal policies are incentivizing this behavior from Apple. If they hire more Green Card holders, then they have employees that they can pay less, and they literally CAN’T quit for fear of deportation.

      But Apple is also the richest company in the world and they employ enough lawyers to know that they’re not supposed to do this kind of shit, so I don’t really have sympathy for them in this case.

        • PeachMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Fair enough, I’m privileged enough to not know the details. But all the big companies do shit like that

    • yiliu@informis.land
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      H1B holders are chained to the employer (as are other visas), but green card holders are not. Source: green card holder.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Apple illegally discriminated against US citizens and other US residents in its hiring and recruitment practices for certain types of positions that went to foreign workers, the US Department of Justice said yesterday.

    The $25 million payment was called the largest ever collected by the Justice Department under the anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

    “We have implemented a robust remediation plan to comply with the requirements of various government agencies as we continue to hire American workers and grow in the US,” Apple said.

    As Reuters noted, “Foreign labor can often be cheaper than hiring US workers, and immigrants who rely on their employers for green card sponsorship are seen as less likely to leave for a different job.”

    These less effective recruitment practices deterred protected workers from applying to positions that Apple preferred to fill instead with PERM beneficiaries."

    Apple has already implemented some of the changes and agreed to “train its employees on the INA’s anti-discrimination requirements and be subject to departmental monitoring for the three-year period of the agreement,” the DOJ said.


    The original article contains 632 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Every company discriminates. That’s what companies do. They only want the best and the brightest. Well, when the best and brightest only come from the most expensive schools and the most rich neighborhoods (meaning white men) how do you think that turns out? The problem is that we don’t lift up disadvantaged populations

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure whatever. Just saying no one should be surprised. Idk why this got such a strong reaction

          • DreamButt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes, it’s illegal. And it should be stopped. But my larger point is that it won’t stop by just making it illegal. Companies will continue to do this while it is in their best interest to do so