Judge_Jury [comrade/them, he/him]

  • 10 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle










  • No one buys their shit. They’re just doing a sartre-quote and any upvotes are from other nazis

    Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies.

    They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. sartre-pipe














  • So in the moral system you’re proposing, it would be an offense to use those buildings without their owner’s permission. The fact that people denied access to those buildings will die as a result, though, is just a part of nature

    So, why would you expect a perspective which values property more than people to stir anyone’s moral feeling? If you don’t expect that, then why are you bothering to frame it in terms of right and wrong?