Globalism
I’m torn on whether this person has a vibes-based vocabulary or is dogwhistling
I am willing to kill us all in a fireball if that’s what it takes for me to drive more dangerously and shave 15 seconds off of my trip. You want to kill excellence
The good news is that if they ride a motorcycle like their pfp suggests and they think like this, they probably also refuse to wear a real motorcycle helmet
No one buys their shit. They’re just doing a sartre-quote and any upvotes are from other nazis
They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.
I am the media I consume and I will defend myself. If you tell me why you like something else instead, that is an attack against me. Also if that media changes in a way I don’t like, the creators are insidiously stealing a part of me
insulting at best.
If nothing else, I’m glad you feel insulted
No you don’t understand, Adrian Zenz has that thing that Jim Carrey had in Liar Liar where he can’t lie! That’s why we have to believe his assertions over all apparent evidence
WHAT
THE FUCK
The levee is made of water
Be in the owning class.
It’s a cheat code to a work-free life.
Gtfo with that misanthropy shit
Go on then, dismiss me with your hexbear memes and be gone.
So pouty
Do you understand the difference between an unused housing unit and an in-use one?
So in the moral system you’re proposing, it would be an offense to use those buildings without their owner’s permission. The fact that people denied access to those buildings will die as a result, though, is just a part of nature
So, why would you expect a perspective which values property more than people to stir anyone’s moral feeling? If you don’t expect that, then why are you bothering to frame it in terms of right and wrong?
Just to compare, what’s your moral read on all the people we deny housing to, who regularly die of exposure while empty housing units outnumber them?
If they were from the class reductionist set, I can’t be too surprised they jumped ship and picked up a whole new worldview. The state of things doesn’t add up if you refuse to consider intersectional channels of oppression and exploitation. They’ll probably jump ship again, and again
I swear to god I’ve had people in the passing lane speed up to ride my bumper because I dared to pass in front of them. I know they’re speeding up, too, because they slow down again once they don’t have anyone in front of them to threaten
Plants are, in my experience, almost comically apolitical. They only care about their own photosynthesis. The idea that that they all work together, as a kingdom, to prop up the forest, is… not plausible.
So, all of them except when we swooped in at the end of WWII to take credit?