Apple is slipping.

This is how we get crap like “soaking”, can’t wait for what ever ludicrous thing is next.

Thank you, glad it was just a bone headed ploy. I will put an edit in.

I find it reported by more then one news thinger, so I feel conformable cross posting it since is fits here. You should provide something other then the logical equivalent to “Naw, I don’t trust it” if you want to be on a high horse.

This is not a reputable news agency, this is an online forum. This story is unconfirmed from a second source, but more then good enough for here. Oh and I will be happy to provide the “small” enterprise’s response/rebuttal to these allegations, if and when they do.

unsubstantiated claims like this can destroy small businesses. There are dozens of examples of this happening.

The small business with hundreds of employees that has been on a major TV show? That one?

So far there are a few stories covering it, only time will tell how real it is.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/no-madam-delivery-app-magicpin-offers-opportunities-to-fired-yesmadam-employees-amid-stress-firing-scandal/articleshow/116145071.cms?from=mdr

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/social/startup-fires-100-employees-after-fooling-them-with-mental-health-survey/articleshow/116139790.cms

https://news.abplive.com/business/yesmadam-layoff-can-an-organization-fire-you-for-being-stressed-pr-stunt-1736532

https://indianstartupnews.com/news/yesmadam-asks-employees-if-they-are-stressed-hr-says-we-fired-those-who-answered-yes-8326306

I am watching the small amount of English news to see if the joke is real or not.

https://indianstartupnews.com/news/yesmadam-asks-employees-if-they-are-stressed-hr-says-we-fired-those-who-answered-yes-8326306

Well there are a few stories on it so far. Guess we will find out if real in the next few days.

Then a member of that private security has a loved one get a claim denied. Then where are we? Right here again.

Not in the USA, and hello.

See top of thread.

Yes results that disprove your point are clearly irrelevant.

Its about jury nullification with one comment on how you will get kicked off a jury for mentioning it. But sure, it would take a genius to see the nuance of that in a post about the popular murder of a health insurance CEO.

You know what the woman was thinking? Odd ability.

Oh no comment on how the judge was found in the wrong?

You know this is the case you showed an entertainment video on as an example, right?

This is the start of this:

"It’s a TOS violation to discuss one of the very real and legitimate responsibilities you have as a juror?

Like, nullification is a thing because it’s very much the absolute very very last defense against bullshit laws being used against people by a corrupt judicial system.

It’s a moral imperative and something anyone sitting on a jury should understand and be willing to use.

What an absurd take, especially since it sounds like it’s all the .world admins having it."

This is about jury nulification, and one comment on how it will get you kicked off a jury does not make the whole thing about dodging jury duty.

Oh found your case: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nv-supreme-court/2018306.html

You might want to check it out, but here is a fun snippet:

"OPINION

During voir dire in this criminal case, the trial judge threw a book against the wall, cursed, and berated, yelled at, and threatened a prospective juror for expressing her belief that she could not be impartial. We conclude that such behavior and statements constitute judicial misconduct and may have discouraged other prospective jurors from answering candidly about their own biases. Because we cannot be convinced that an impartial jury was selected under these circumstances where the judge did nothing to alleviate the intimidating atmosphere that he created, we reverse and remand for a new trial."

We’re talking about getting OUT of jury duty

No we are not.

Telling the law to fuck off in official sounding language prior to being an actual juror is not, and that is essentially what the statement “I support JN” is doing.

You do know there is a whole thing about a US citizen having a right to tell the law to fuck off right?

Also where did you get the “so can I please be excused” part from? No one was talking nullification in this case in order to dodge jury duty, but that they don’t think the assassin should be punished.

Basic logic as well. The idea that a judge will “deal with you accordingly” for having an opinion is the wild part.

Yes, you will. If you flat out say “I support Jury Nullification” during voir dire the judge will consider it flagrant contempt for the courts and deal with you accordingly.

Source? Cause this is some wild shit.