![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
I was gonna say I was still waiting for a seaman 2, but apparently it existed in Japan. Still, with AI bullshit being all the rage I could see it make a comeback.
I was gonna say I was still waiting for a seaman 2, but apparently it existed in Japan. Still, with AI bullshit being all the rage I could see it make a comeback.
Euro gamer with the 3/5 because they actually tell you the story while playing. Crazy.
Don’t understand why it’s legal to make a PAC and have your chief of staff head it.
To be fair I don’t understand why PACs are legal at all, but whatever.
Razed*
While I believe they answered well, the short being it being published doesn’t mean it is automatically science, there are plenty of shitty publications that care more about number of articles than ensuring good practices, and good peer review.
The point of what he was saying was that you need to publish it for it to be science tho, as science is there to build knowledge and increase our understanding, and not publishing does not allow that and thus is not science, even if the methods were good and the logic was sound.
If it’s not published it’s not science. The Contrapositive is if it is science, then it is published.
Not if it is published it is science.
Nah it was 2018 (with two others). Had to check if he has two, but nope.
Dude won a Turing award 6 years ago, is a major player in a field that is rapidly expanding, Professor at NYU, and thus is likely part of a lot of different research going on. He may not be writing up all 80 personally, but his work and name is part of them. If it was some nobody working in a slower field I would definitely be cautious about 80 papers in 5 years.
To be fair maybe he will also reverse the part where Biden removed eligibility from EV’s for the Tax credit that aren’t sourced from America.
Only bad thing he could do is remove the emissions regulations which weren’t even harsh.
But the possible number of outcomes is not limited by the subset of living humans. While we may have a currently highest number that doesn’t mean it IS the highest possible, nor that there is exactly one of them.
Are you suggesting gayness is measured in number of humans?
No, not empty seats, just firing 20% of all school staff so we’re still understaffed.
Ah thanks I can’t fuckin read lol.
80% say yes, and yet also a majority says no. Got it
Damn that’s a lot of links. Thanks!
Did I miss the part where he talks about cooperation with other countries and what that looks like? Cuz I only saw him praising China and stuff. Which like whatever, but I was interested in what the model of cooperation was and how they plan to work with other countries to build them up instead of exploit them like the US.
Tigers also kill people way more often than bears.
Stats on this are hard to compare because black bears are responsible for 1.2 kills in the US per year and tigers are like 34 kills per year in India which does have like 4x the population of humans, but also there’s a LOT less tigers to do that killing [like 5,000 tigers to 400,000 black bears] So like… yeah.
I mean, they very likely won’t, but you do you.
Looked it up fairly recently (cuz you know men got mad about bears or whatever) but don’t have source on me: Black bears cause about 1.2 human deaths per year across all of America.
Interesting. So strong, durable, sticky, memory plastic made by adding an ionised liquid instead of just water.
The sticky bit seems weird, wonder if they could find a way to remove that.