Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 27 days agoFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1533arrow-down119file-textcross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
arrow-up1514arrow-down1imageFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostUnruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 27 days agomessage-square83fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
minus-squarerahlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·26 days ago Well, you’re wrong. LOL limited Ah! So now you’re changing your tune! Not “preventing” but “limiting”. Best of luck, maybe you’ll get to reality in the end.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·26 days agoSo, amassing of power can’t be limited in your opinion?
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-226 days agoBecause that’s what you’re implying.
minus-squarerahlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·26 days agoI’m neither saying nor implying that.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-226 days agoYes you are: “We” cannot stop human beings from gaining power over others so the question is moot.
minus-squarerahlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·26 days agoI see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase: “We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·26 days agoNo one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
minus-squarerahlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·26 days ago No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
LOL
Ah! So now you’re changing your tune! Not “preventing” but “limiting”. Best of luck, maybe you’ll get to reality in the end.
So, amassing of power can’t be limited in your opinion?
Why are you asking me that?
Because that’s what you’re implying.
I’m neither saying nor implying that.
Yes you are:
I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase:
“We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation.
Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.