• li10
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 days ago

    I hate the “spatial” mixes.

    Sometimes they’re done really well, but most of the time it’s just putting different parts of the song in different areas and makes it sound “diluted”.

    Like, the guitar is in front of you, then the bass is behind and to the left… why??

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 days ago

      You’re missing a key ingredient: Lysergic acid diethylamide.

      In all other circumstances I agree with you.

      • li10
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Lysergic acid diethylamide doesn’t fix a bad mix.

        You can still hear all the separate instruments surrounding you on a good regular mix, all the spatial does is break the interwoven sound.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Lysergic acid diethylamide doesn’t fix a bad mix.

          I mean… Have you ever listened to “Whole Lotta Love” or “Axis: Bold as Love” while tripping balls? Those panning parts are pretty wild.

    • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      My understanding is that most (at least rock) music is mixed this way, just subtle enough to help your brain pick out instruments but not enough to consciously notice.

      • li10
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        Music is mixed that way, but spatial then takes a hammer to that concept.

        It takes away the single interwoven sound and imo sounds like different tracks being played on opposite sides of the room.

        I usually try the atmos mix for an album if it’s available on tidal, and usually all it ever does is remove the punch from songs.