• Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It literally isn’t real socialism. They don’t even have free healthcare.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As my previous post implied, socialism can refer to a school of thought/philosophy, or a movement, or a political position. China’s government clearly does not claim it has achieved a society with a socialist mode of production (which I’m assuming is what you mean by “real socialism”?), but that doesn’t contradict their claim of being a socialist, and further, communist party.

      Furthermore, free healthcare is irrelevant. It’s not a precondition of socialism. The working class can control and own their means of production without having free healthcare. It’s a great policy which I support, but it’s not socialist.

    • Halasham@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Okay, so you’ve got one criteria: Socialized Medicine, care to list out the rest of them for how you determine if something is socialism?