• Pleat1752
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    Organic Maps is better for “normal” users if you ask me. Osmand is better for pro users but quite clunky.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yes, Osmand is definitely clunky by comparison. But the UX is getting slowly more intuitive. I see no reason why Osmand’s easy-peasy defaults mode cannot end up equal to to OM. They’re not far off, and at that point its superiority would be clear as day.

      Personally I wish the OM devs could have contributed their talents to making Osmand better. Really feels like wasteful duplication which benefits nobody benefits except the egos of a handful of developers. A common problem with FOSS and this is a great example IMO.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I wish Organic maps would add some of the features from OsmAnd. I want the ability to select a part of the map to avoid.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Something changed to that effect a while back, yes. OM continues to look and feel a bit better (possibly a subjective experience) but it is so feature-poor by comparison.

        • przmk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I just tested it again on my Fairphone 5 and it’s still slow. I’m not talking about the UI but the rendering of maps. Unless they somehow manage to fix that, it’ll keep being a poor experience.