MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 month agoEffort vs "work"slrpnk.netimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1395arrow-down160
arrow-up1335arrow-down1imageEffort vs "work"slrpnk.netMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squarerobinoberglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month agoYou’re not antiwork, you’re anti-capitalism.
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 month agoSomebody can be both. And whatever purity test you think this post failed isn’t a helpful one.
minus-squarerobinoberglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoWell, sure. One could also be a vegetarian and a Pisces. But that’s not relevant to the quite literal exploitation that is the issue in the OP
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoThe post is very clearly relevant, it’s addressing the innate problems of work. That’s antiwork.
minus-squarerobinoberglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoNope, it is not. Exploitation is about capitalism, not work. People who do work without being exploited feel satisfied by it. From worker owned cooperwtives to grandma making a scarf.
You’re not antiwork, you’re anti-capitalism.
Somebody can be both. And whatever purity test you think this post failed isn’t a helpful one.
Well, sure. One could also be a vegetarian and a Pisces. But that’s not relevant to the quite literal exploitation that is the issue in the OP
The post is very clearly relevant, it’s addressing the innate problems of work. That’s antiwork.
Nope, it is not. Exploitation is about capitalism, not work. People who do work without being exploited feel satisfied by it. From worker owned cooperwtives to grandma making a scarf.