• @rah
    link
    English
    134
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Why not prefer apartments in your own town?

    Noise. Neighbours being closer.

    • IWantToFuckSpez
      link
      fedilink
      789 months ago

      That’s only true if the apartment is a shitty American 5 over 1 stick building. In a modern concrete apartment with concrete internal walls you wouldn’t hear the neighbors.

      • @blueson@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Exactly. Here in Sweden if you live into a newly built apartement you are basically guranteed grade A sound isolation.

        Even older ones usually hold high quality because of renovations.

        • DreamButt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          209 months ago

          You’d think living in a building that was built in 2020 would be good enough. But here I am every night cursing my neighbors who stomp around at 11pm

          • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            359 months ago

            Blame shitty government regulations and capitalism for shitty apartments.

            The minimum standard we should expect is that you can pound a punching bag at 3am without your neighbours hearing anything.

      • @theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Well, I live in a America and can’t wait to get out of apartments. I’ve moved a lot in my life and have a lower middle class income. I’ve never found an apartment or condo where I didn’t have to deal with hearing neighbors yelling, stomping, talking outside my front door in the hallway, opening sliding doors, listening to music, etc. Only twice, when I lived with a friend in their house, did I feel like I had any peace or privacy.

        Sure, there would be lawns mowed and all that, but I’d take that over the things I’ve heard and worried about my neighbors having heard.

        If I could have real privacy in an apartment I could afford I’d continue to rent, assuming I don’t get priced out of the market completely at this rate.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          139 months ago

          The entire reason your prices out is that there aren’t enough apartments though.

          • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            169 months ago

            This is the shit that exhausts me about NIMBYs. They have cause and effect totally reversed and I don’t know how that myth got so ingrained.

            • @Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              129 months ago

              Exactly! We’ve gotten into this weird feedback loop where NIMBY policies like restrictive zoning and parking minimums and setback requirements have made there be a systemic shortage of housing in total, but particularly a shortage of dense, walkable housing near transit. This has warped the market such that large houses on large plots of land – which are objectively the luxury housing option – are cheaper than apartments or condos in a dense, walkable community near transit. This makes people think density = expensive, which makes people think we need to get rid of density for the sake of affordability, which just makes the shortage even more severe!

              Utter insanity

                • @theparadox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  29 months ago

                  Can you elaborate? What about stating that I do not have the choice for noise isolated apartments demonstrates that I object to good, affordable apartments near me ?

                  • @w2qw@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    39 months ago

                    There’s nothing that differentiates “affordable” apartments those at that aren’t except the amount that are available. Maybe you aren’t a NIMBY but a lot do use similar arguments and then start on about heritage protection.

          • @theparadox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            So what should I do in my current situation so that my choices about where to live help to improve the overall situation regarding housing and land use?

            Note, my point isn’t Apartments Bad. My point is that my only choice is overpriced shitty apartments.

            • @SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Voting locally is the single most important thing anyone can do to fix the housing crisis. End single-family zoning in your area.

      • @TauriWarrior@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We lived in a concrete apartment, couldn’t hear the neighbors in their apartments but could in the hallways, and smell everything too, could hear the cars revving outside, and had to put up with the weekly (if not more often) fire alarm at 2am which meant evacuating the building. And no space for anything, no hobbies that might generate noise. Also have to deal with STRATA, hope you didnt want to put anything on your balcony cause they didn’t want that, hope you can wait 12 months for the leaking ceiling to be fixed thats dripping and growing mould.

        Also it cost a fortune to heat or cool the place, we’re in a bigger place now that costs 1/2 as much to heat/cool

      • @rah
        link
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Neighbours will still be closer in apartments.

        • @SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          99 months ago

          Take it from someone who is autistic, highly introverted and has only lived in apartments in my adult life: you do not ever need to see or interact with your neighbors. It’s as optional as with a house. The most I see of my neighbors is that once every few weeks I might stand in the elevator with one of them for 15 seconds.

          • @rah
            link
            English
            29 months ago

            you do not ever need to see or interact with your neighbors

            I’m not sure why you’re trying to tell me this. I’ve got my own experience living in apartments and having neighbours.

            • @jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Yep, it’s a crapshoot depending on your neighbors. Back in my dense living days, things were pretty good, except when the drug dealer moved in next door…

              Same applies to some extend to suburban density, but even crappy neighbors are harder to notice… Except the house that does car tuning all the time with a priority on loud revving engines… Ugh…

            • @Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Yup. My prior experience with apartments - even single height apartments - is that either you’re going to annoy someone with sounds (had a neighbor that worked nights and hated every thing I did when I was home) or you’ll be annoyed with someone not being quiet when you personally need it.

              Hell I had a house with a neighbor who rented that liked to leave their dog tied up outside at 5pm barking incessantly. Not fun to come home from a day of work with a stressful commute to try to unwind.

              I love my quiet.

          • @rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The instant I step out my door I’m surrounded by people in an apartment. Sorry but nothing you said is true. I’ll never live in an apartment again.

    • @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      389 months ago

      Ownership. You will not own your apartment, it will be owned by your landlord and you will pay him whatever he demands. You will not own the forest, either. The state will, or some private entity will. No trespassing.

      • @J4g2F@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        399 months ago

        You can still own and buy appartements in most places in the world. Then there are many forms of social housing.

        Rent to own is also a possibility but not seen in most countries.

        Seems your problem is not ownership but landlords.

        Some countries in Europe have the right to roam on any land. State owned and private owned. (Maybe more countries somewhere else have it to but I don’t know)

        It does not need to be so terrible. In some places it just is because of profits

        • @neatchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          Owning an apartment and owning land are wildly different. The housing structure alone is not the entirety of home ownership.

          • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            129 months ago

            Since we’re just talking hypotheticals anyway, let’s say in the second image the land is actually owned by the owners of the apartments, like a co-op.

            • @neatchee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              That’s still not ownership. That’s co-ownership. I’m not free to do what I want with it, when I want.

              Same reason I hate HOAs

              • hypelightfly
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                I own my house and don’t have an HOA. Guess what?

                Still can’t do whatever I want with it when I want. Still need to get permits and follow local/state regulations.

                • @jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  69 months ago

                  But those regulations tend to be more sane.

                  Oh, you planted zoysia grass and maintain it well? That’s “inharmonious” , you need to tear that out and plant fescue.

                  You don’t have a maple tree of at least 8 feet in height in a particular spot in your yard? Inharmonious again, you need to buy a tree, can’t wait for a sapling to grow.

                  Your driveway has dirt on it? You must get it pressure washed.

                  You want to park your vehicle in your driveway? It better not have any branding from a company on it, or it better not be an older car or any pickup truck, those are too ugly for our precious neighborhood.

                  Regulations tend to be “don’t make fire hazards”, or “don’t block streets”, generally you can’t get a regulation on the books without an actual rationale behind it.

                • @jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  49 months ago

                  Whatever reasonable thing you want will tend to fly though. Versus HOA which often dictate crazy restrictions.

                  • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -19 months ago

                    Which would be less of a problem if there were more housing stock.

                    But also, we need regulations on HOAs.

      • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        Yeah that’s my main concern. Also less space to store things like my bike.

        Then there’s the upstairs neighbors. Like I get that the kids are loud. But also could the kids stop throwing stuff at my bird feeder. And their upstairs neighbors flooded the dang place

      • RaivoKulli
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        You can own and apartment. And there’s right to roam.

        • @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          There is no such thing as universal right to roam in the US. Likewise, apartment ownership (we call them “condos” when you can own one rather than rent) exists here, but by far is the minority option in multi-family housing. You can claim you want to buy a condo or apartment as much as you want, but that doesn’t do you any good when no one is selling. Units are built to be rented which is a recurring revenue stream, which big capital likes a lot more.

          The significant problem is not that nobody is whacking out slabs of apartment housing fast enough. The issue is that our underlying capitalist system is fucked, and a simple anti-car attitude is not going to fix that.

      • @Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        40
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I live in an apartment with actual good sound-proofing. It’s almost dead silent inside except for the quiet hum of my AC. It’s legitimately so much quieter than my gf’s family’s house, where you constantly hear the rush of cars driving by on the street. Not to mention leafblowers and lawnmowers.

          • Neato
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            We need the insulation we saw in the Fight Club movie. The entire apartment blew out the window and everyone else was fine.

        • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          You realize you are speaking from a very lucky position right? Everyone here agrees quiet apartments with clean facilities are pretty nice, but a large majority of apartment dwellers live in older, very noisy, very poorly managed facilities.

          It’s very fair to want the conversation on improving apartments, it is super important. But you.have to acknowledge that people’s response about their apartment history is informed from lived experience.

          • @biddy@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            It’s not luck. Things are built for a reason, the regulations and structures of society are designed, and it artificially dictate s what is built. Perhaps they live in a place where the regulations mean that sensible livable apartments are fairly abundant. Perhaps you don’t. That’s not luck, those places were designed that way.

            • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              The homie was pooped out in a place where it was possible, and that was luck.

              • @Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I was born and raised in suburbia and only moved into where I am now. It is indeed partially luck that I had the capability and opportunity to move to a new city that has abundant apartments, missing middle housing, and a sane rental market. As a result of the abundance of apartments available, landlords have a credible threat of vacancy, and thus rents are lower, there are fewer restrictions (e.g., pet restrictions), and having decent sound insulation is common.

          • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -19 months ago

            I think the phrase “lived experience” should automatically disqualify someone from speaking about any topic. They’re just anecdotes, usually in contradiction to actual data.

            • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Ok?

              So for example the “lived experience” of black folks in the southern US in the 60s isn’t valuable I’m the discussion of racism in America? Of course it is. Their first hand experience (indeed anecdotal as you say) is meaningful.

              In the context of apartments, especially in America, millions of units are no where near the soundproofing or quality OP was describing. You could determine that by age of the buildings alone.

              Do you have sound dampening data for apartments across the country?

              Anecdotes are only problematic when they are purported as data. By definition someone relaying their lives experience suggests they are describing their individual life to you. It’s fine to want to move from anecdote to data, but when you talk about “disqualification” from discussion you’re just being a gatekeeper. There is no data rigor here, this is a message board about a meme.

              Lastly the person I responded to described THEIR lived experience (the quiet apartment they have) so that further insulates myself and others from any objective requirements to comment.

              • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                So for example the “lived experience” of black folks in the southern US in the 60s isn’t valuable I’m the discussion of racism in America?

                When their “lived experience” is “no, I’ve never seen any racism!” then no, it’s not really valuable, and it’s incredibly suspect to boot.

                It’s fine to want to move from anecdote to data

                Let’s just start with data. Anecdotes are supplementary. The way “lived experience” is usually used (and is used here) is to provide the primary support to an argument.

                • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  Again you’re expecting a rigor beyond the venue of discussion, especially given that the person I replied to started with an anecdote as well.

                  If you have data on the soundproofedness of apartments across the US to contextualize the common consensus to the level you expect I would be happy to browse it.

                  Until then I’m comfortable believing anyone (as in the many commenters here) who say their apartment was loud. The several I lived in were as well so I have no reason to question it

                  • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    29 months ago

                    you’re expecting a rigor beyond the venue of discussion

                    Maybe, but I’m trying to change that. I think we can all be smarter than just trading anecdotes.

                    And your post emphasizes my point. We’re talking about a preferred hypothetical society, while the point he was trying to make with his anecdote is that apartments are and always will be poorly soundproofed, world without end. Obviously it sounds absurd when you extrapolate it out to the societal level, but when you couch it in anecdotal terms it makes the argument seem worth discussing on the face of it. It’s not.

                    We can talk about how currently apartments are shoddy in the US, that’s a worthwhile discussion. But to be against the idea of apartments in general because apartments right now are poorly regulated is silly.

        • ElleChaise
          link
          fedilink
          -59 months ago

          You’re speaking from a privileged minority viewpoint, most people don’t report living that way in apartments. I’ve lived extensively in both apartments and suburban homes, suburbs have always provided more peace and quiet. For every day that’s been too loud due to lawn machines (a lot of suburbs it’s only once a month for context) I’ve had a dozen more with people partying, stomping, fighting, shouting, grudge starting, complaint making, roach infestation having, shitty corporate landlord owning ruined days in city apartments. And they all costed a lot more. I’m paying half what I would in a city apartment for my suburban townhome with a lawn, and a park, and pool, and walikg trails, conveniently nearby all amenities in my area.

          That’s the part y’all need to adopt to get people on your side by the way; assure people who like suburbs that your plan isn’t to tear down their existing environments for new ones. We’re scared shitless you’re all gonna try to force us into boxes, many of us will fight violently to oppose such action. Make it clear you’re talking only about NEW developments and I think most people will support your cause. I do in principle, but the selfish American in me isn’t about to give up my already existing paradise for your apartment block, especially when you provide no answers to the corporate landlord landscape we’re operating in. Those of us who have been alive long enough know these plans usually end in lost livelihoods and destroyed dreams, the true benefits only going to the upper echelon of the highest earning capitalists.

          • @kurosawaa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            109 months ago

            If they built more apartments, apartments with good sound proofing would be more common. I used to live in Taiwan, and every cheap apartment I lived in had excellent sound proofing.

            Once there is more competition in the apartment/condo market, quality will go up.

            • @Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              129 months ago

              Exactly. When there is a housing shortage, landlords and developers have no meaningful competition, therefore they can offer sub-par housing for too-high prices.

              Build more housing, make landlords sweat about vacancy, and you’ll see higher-quality units spring up like magic.

              My city, Montreal, for instance, has perhaps the most affordable and YIMBY housing market in a major North American city, and the result is rents are cheap (by big city in North America standards), quality of life is very high, and landlords have much less negotiating power. For example, I was able to negotiate my rent down before moving in, and it’s also quite rare to see all manner of onerous restrictions like pet bans in apartments here.

              When landlords have a credible fear of vacancy, they can’t afford to scare off prospective tenants with high rents, poor sound insulation, and pet bans.

          • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            109 months ago

            Well that’s a plain ridiculous fear, you think government thugs are going to go door to door through the suburbs rounding up homeowners and forcing them into apartments?

            The idea is to build enough, at a high enough quality, and at a price point, where it’s more appealing to new buyers.

        • blanketswithsmallpox
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Rural neighbors. Even worse. Cowshit, ag runoff ruining our waterways, heavy machinery blocking streets, Trump flags inside every house and old boys racism everywhere the moment you’re ‘in’ with them.

          Instead of loud neighbors you have to deal with white trash family fights and drunk driving everywhere. Meanwhile everyone has a chip on their shoulder about city and suburban people ruining their world somehow yet they never participate in any of it lmfao.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            You’re still too close if you can hear all that.

            And I rather like the smell of cow shit

          • @rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I never hear my neighbors in a rural area. This community is so blatantly full of shit it’s laughable. As if you don’t deal with white trash or drunk drivers anywhere else. Instead in an apartment the white trash are banging each other with the windows open and getting arrested at 3 am with 8 cop cars flashing their lights in the parking lot.

            No one listens to ideas from fuckcars-type people because they’re gaslighting lies that no one except other niche weirdos sympathizes with. Please do keep trying to tell rural people how much worse their situation is than living in an apartment. You don’t sound like a condescending jerk at all.

            You could have just admitted there are pros and cons to both but instead you go on this gaslighting crusade to try prove someone else’s lived experience wrong. Good luck with that approach, no one is listening to you except other weirdos.

        • @baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Sure, I doubt there is anyone here against rural self-sustained living, it is probably one of the more eco-friendly and humane way of living.

          But once frequent car trip and road maintainance cames into equation, it might not be the most eco-friendly way any more. I understand not everyone cares about their fellow human being, but this is the point this post is trying to make.

          • LanternEverywhere
            link
            fedilink
            11
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            iirc, the further away you live from a city then the worse you impact the environment. Unless you’re literally a fully self-sustaining homesteader with no roads or utilities anywhere near you, then living in a city is basically always better for the environment.

            • @Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              169 months ago

              Turns out commuting by a gasoline-powered car on a sea of asphalt roads every day is bad for the planet. Who’d have thought?

            • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              That’s starting to change with solar power and EVs. I could see a small number of mostly off the grid homesteaders in a sustainable future. But they’d have to pay for the privilege

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        Suburbs are the worst of both worlds. Gimme a cave on the top of the mountain miles from anywhere, thanks.

      • Uranium3006
        link
        fedilink
        89 months ago

        All the fun of overbearing neighbors telling you what you can or can’t do with all the inability to take the train anywhere

      • Fredsshilksirt
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        don’t forget the dudebros driving around blasting bass every 20min. I hope they all go deaf. peacocking morons.

      • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        It’d take it over the sound of the upstairs neighbor fucking his microwave while bowling at the same time

      • @rah
        link
        English
        39 months ago

        I don’t know about that. I don’t live in America and I’ve never lived in suburbs. I have lived in flats (apartments) and in dense areas.

        • @baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          I lived both in dense neighborhoods, rural neighborhoods, and suburbs. Trust me, the more things you give your neighbor to do, the more shenanigans they will make, especially in place where everyone is bored out of their mind.

          • @rah
            link
            English
            39 months ago

            I don’t care how much they do, I care about how close they all are to me while they do it.

            • @baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              What about going to your doorstep to tell you that you need to maintain a lawn? your door needs to be a certain color? Or you cannot park your car on your own property? Or you cannot park somewhere simply because "they have always parked there? Or deafening motor noise that can be heard a block away right across the road from you? leaf blower and lawn mower so loud that literally require the person to wear a head phone to operate safely, right next to your house?

              These are just a few things I have seen in the suburbs. Are these count as “close enough to you”?

              • @rah
                link
                English
                39 months ago

                I don’t see why you would expect an absense of these things in a city?

                • @baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  No, I have experience none of these in the cities, because a lot of time, there is no HOA, most places do not have lawns, and I dont need a car in the city.

                  Also there are in general lawn mowing and leaf blowing are much more moderate in city, because they know they are surrounded by people.

                  • @rah
                    link
                    English
                    49 months ago

                    I have experience none of these in the cities

                    I grew up in a house in a city with a garden with a lawn which had to be regularly mowed with a lawnmower. We don’t have "HOA"s in our country.

                    Also there are in general lawn mowing and leaf blowing are much more moderate in city, because they know they are surrounded by people.

                    Wow. Your country is very different from my country.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This isn’t a particularly convincing analogy. Islands have limited space. The suburbs where I live border tons of open space and parks. Meanwhile, our school district is already overwhelmed with children, so converting commercial spaces into apartments will merely add to congestion and sprawl. NIMBY’s make a convincing argument against denser residential construction.

      A better focus would be the ability to simplify public transit and walkability. Town centers and public spaces could be more accessible with denser residential construction, and the additional green space can be closer to where you live without everyone needing their own half-acre yard to mow and water.

      • @rah
        link
        English
        39 months ago

        This isn’t a particularly convincing analogy.

        I think you replied in the wrong place? I didn’t give an analogy.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          You’re right, I meant to reply to the OP. I agree with you. Still figuring out Lemmy, sorry.

      • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        The suburbs where I live border tons of open space and parks.

        Yeah but then they build more houses and destroy more of those open spaces to make room for more suburban sprawl

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          Yep, Toll Bros buys a horse farm and makes half acre mcmansions. There are some big properties that have covenants that prevent it, and the zoning in my township won’t allow new subdivisions less than 2 acres, and we have some great municipal parks which will never be developed. But that means everything is spread out to make public transit untenable. You need a car to get to the nearest train station, and then you need a car when you get off the train at any stop outside of the city.

          There’s no one-size solution to combat sprawl. High density housing makes a lot of sense some places, and not so much in others.

    • @FederatedSaint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      God I hate living in high density housing. Dogs yapping, bass and loud music booming, smelly, loud, animal poop and pee on every green/natural area, higher crime, more traffic, etc.