Not that it’s bad. For me, it’s actually very useful, I just find it mildly amusing that an app for managing AppImages is packaged as a Flatpak, despite the two formats being widely known as competitors*.

* Okay, most people (including me) would say that the two formats are for different use cases and aren’t directly competitors, but for the eyes of a lot of AppImage purists and Flatpak critics, they are.

  • @Mane25
    link
    English
    259 months ago

    What’s off? That looks like it might be useful.

      • @Mane25
        link
        English
        159 months ago

        I mean they are two things that co-exist, it’s not like they’re in commercial competition. Flatpak itself is usually distributed as an RPM or deb.

        • 10EXP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          OP is mostly joking about the appimage utility not having an appimage itself