• Patch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That seems like a very expensive way of avoiding talking to your wife.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or it’s so I can talk to her instead of ignoring her…….

      I get it, there’s a fancy piece of equipment and you cant find a use for it, so now you insult the people who point out the extremely obvious answer you missed.

      • Patch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was only trying to be funny, apologies. I thought it was ludicrous enough that it’d pass. Channeling some boomer humour.

        Seriously though, I do understand the appeal of it, just not the appeal-to-price ratio. £200 is a lot of money for a glorified screen mirroring device. It’s not that it’s overpriced per se (it’s probably about right in terms of the cost of the hardware), just that I don’t understand how it can be worth it with that functionality at that price point.