I don’t have much of a problem either way as I don’t think I’ll be engaging in political discussion on this website past this post but it seems like any sort of non-left wing opinions or posts are immediately trashed on here. That’s fine. There’s clearly a more liberal audience here and that’s okay. I just don’t want Lemmy to become a echo chamber for any side and it seems to be that way when it comes to politics already.

Mostly making this post just to drum up discussion as I’m new here.

  • Chipthemonk@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the record, I would not consider myself right wing. But I do oppose many leftist ideologies. Grievance studies (Critical race theory, queer theory, and other ideologies based in post modern belief systems), for instance, are eroding many useful and productive enlightenment ideas. Color blindness is a legitimate way to reduce racism. Instead, leftists believe they should elevate group identity at all costs, thereby expanding and heightening racism. Queer theory denies human physiology, elevating the idea that everything is socially constructed. This framework is a grave distortion of the reality.

    I agree that conservatives need to do a better job with their policies. Trump was a stain, and the few (okay maybe more than a few) loud idiots in the party make conservatism look bad. But if left wingers only get their information about right wingers from hyper left sources, we are going to have a lot of distorted views.

    On social media, people are served more and more radical content. Much of that content includes great distortions of the “other side,” which pushes people further into an untenable and undesirable belief system.

    We need more debate and we also need people to stop simply calling the other side morons.

    • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
      shield
      M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be absolutely clear to anyone who runs across this, this person has been banned from our instance, you don’t need to report it again. The only reason this reply is still up, is for others to see all the ways in which this person is wrong and the whole they dug themselves when they did reply to someone and were rightfully reported and ejected from our instance.

    • potpie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Grievance studies (Critical race theory, queer theory, and other ideologies based in post modern belief systems), for instance, are eroding many useful and productive enlightenment ideas.

      Have you studied any of these yourself? Or are you relying on characterizations of them you heard in media?

      Color blindness is a legitimate way to reduce racism.

      In theory, sure. But in practice it often gets used as a rug to sweep racism under.

      Instead, leftists believe they should elevate group identity at all costs, thereby expanding and heightening racism.

      Keep on mind this is a society where certain groups have been marginalized and terrorized for decades or even centuries. “Elevating” them is only a reaction to that long-entrenched bigotry. But (what’s that quote?..) when you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression. Attempting to bring historically marginalized groups into equal footing with mainstream groups probably will look like they’re being “elevated” to the people who enjoy the privilege of being accepted broadly by default.

      • Chipthemonk@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I have a Ph.D., you will encounter grievance studies and post modern ideologies when you pursue this path. I have indeed studied the philosophical foundations of these ideologies. I don’t agree with post modern ideologies, nor do I agree that you can state that something is purely constructed by a culture. An individual is defined both by their physiology and their societal structure. It’s physiology and culture. Post modernism denies objective truth. I believe in objective truth. I also believe in intentionality, which post modernism denies. We could go on. Stop using the “have you actually studied this” argument and actually engage in productive debate. An appeal to academic authority is really not useful here.

        It seems some forget, for instance, that the native population of America benefitted greatly from their encounters with colonial people from France and Britain. They sold and traded items. They learned knew technologies. Hell, many native tribes fought alongside the Americans during the American revolution. They also fought alongside France. The whole situation of the American colonies is really messy. Anyway, colonialism is not a black and white issue.

        • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
          shield
          M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It seems some forget, for instance, that the native population of America benefitted greatly from their encounters with colonial people from France and Britain.

          ah, yes, the minimum of 30 million people killed just in the Americas really benefited. get out of here with this settler colonialist apologia, my dude. you are a textbook case of why nobody is interested in hearing out conservative “thought”, which appears to be impossibly tied to being pro-genocide.

        • bucho@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Either you’re the stupidest person who has ever received a PhD in the world, or you’re a fucking liar. There’s absolutely no god damned way that you can hold this many imbecilic, counter-to-reality views while having had to engage with primary sources for the multiple years it took to achieve a PhD. Stop lying, seriously. Nobody buys your bullshit anyway.

    • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Queer theory denies human physiology, elevating the idea that everything is socially constructed

      You’re already getting pushback on your other points, so I thought I would weigh in here. Biologically speaking, sex is multifaceted, variable, and somewhat malleable. Even anatomically or physiologically scientists say that gender and sex are not as simple or clean cut as you are making it out to be. Additionally, gender diverse people can be found across all cultures and throughout history - transgender people are not an invention of the post-modern era.

      I don’t think that acknowledging the reality that human experience is complex and multi-faceted is a left wing value. It is evident to anyone who honestly engages with scientific consensus and with the lived experiences of LGBTQ folks that those people exist. They’re not going anywhere, and I don’t think it’s especially “left wing” to say we ought to make space for them in society to just live their lives as they are.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Colour blindness is not a way of combatting racism.

      If you have a real world system, and you bias it heavily to be unequal, then you try and correct it by biasing it to be equal, the average output is still vastly unequal, and the absolute best case scenario you can hope for is that it will trend towards equality over time without ever reaching it.

      There’s a reason that people who actually study and think about the topic come out as antiracist and people who don’t think it about it except when it inconveniences them just wish everyone would stop talking about it and we could pretend like it didn’t exist.

      • Chipthemonk@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, it is. There are a lot of academics that have fallen prey to post modern ideologies like anti racism. But there are also academics that haven’t, like myself and John McWhorter.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ‘nuh uh I don’t believe that’ isn’t an argument.

          I’ve explained how balanced system + inequality + balanced system = inequality, and you’ve just said “nuh uh that’s not convenient for me”.

    • HumanPenguin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      leftists believe they should elevate group identity at all costs,

      And this very clearly indicates that your own Ideas have little left wing ideas. Seriously lack unbiased input.

      As that statement is entirely false.

      As I said. Anyone can set up an instance with any political ideal they like. But if you fail to remove commenters with ideas that oppose the right of others to exist as free entities. No one wanting top join you. Is not removal of your right to free speech. No one is banning right wing ideals. If you fail to sell them in a way people want to listen to. That is your issue, not ours.

      • Chipthemonk@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Entirely false? No. Many leftists have adopted ideologies like CRT full step. It’s quite common. I agree not all have, and many still adopt the tenants that brought many civil rights (like color blindness, which is a legitimate way towards reducing racism, which is a culture construct in the first place. But the fact is that there are many on the left that have swallowed the post modern pill.

        • HumanPenguin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          2 faults

          It is a biased view. That those ideologies. In accepting the harm, systemic racism has done over history, in some way advance one group over another.

          Many Leftists dose not in any way cover the rest of the world. When these ideologies are only really supported in any way. By the United States. Where left really does not exist by the measure of the rest of the world.

    • fades@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, what a shocking comment. Explains your original I suppose.

      You can’t just lay judgement on something because you don’t like it. You need to actually understand it, hopefully your read the other responses you got with an open mind, lest ye drift deeper into bigotry via ignorance (chosen ignorance, at that)