hedge@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-27 months agoWhy Wikipedia’s Highway Editors Took the Exit Rampslate.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up195arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkWhy Wikipedia’s Highway Editors Took the Exit Rampslate.comhedge@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-27 months agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFlaxlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-27 months agoI think robust road information would be good for Wikipedia. I used Wikipedia as a guide on drawing Heraldry, which it has great resources for and even example images to trace off of. “It’s an encyclopaedia, not an art tutorial!”
minus-squarejarfil@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-27 months agoThere is still Portal:Roads, it looks reasonably robust to me. “It’s an encyclopaedia, not an art tutorial!” Actually… an encyclopedia is an “everything” kind of intro tutorial. It isn’t supposed too get to much in depth though, that’s what sources are for.
I think robust road information would be good for Wikipedia. I used Wikipedia as a guide on drawing Heraldry, which it has great resources for and even example images to trace off of.
“It’s an encyclopaedia, not an art tutorial!”
There is still Portal:Roads, it looks reasonably robust to me.
Actually… an encyclopedia is an “everything” kind of intro tutorial. It isn’t supposed too get to much in depth though, that’s what sources are for.