Pope Francis has formally approved allowing priests to bless same-sex couples, with a new document explaining a radical change in Vatican policy by insisting that people seeking God’s love and mercy shouldn’t be subject to “an exhaustive moral analysis” to receive it.

  • rah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    That seems like a very narrow definition. Are you sure you’re not just spouting your opinion?

      • rah
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Vetted by whom?

          • rah
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            No you didn’t.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Can you not answer the question? I didnt think it was very hard. Did you not understand what you were asked?

              • rah
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Did you not understand what you were asked?

                No. You haven’t explained who is doing the vetting you’re asking about, which is critical to answering.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I asked you, pumpkin. Youre the one who answers. If I was answering my own questions, I wouldnt be talking to you.

                  Do you need a pad of paper? Maybe some crayons? This isnt normally a difficult question.

                  • rah
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    You’re not making any sense.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Provide a definition if you think my very broad description with a single example out of many possible examples is inaccurate.

      • rah
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        inaccurate

        What do you mean?

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You questioned whether I was just spouting an opinion, which would imply that it was inaccurate.

          Feel free to provide a definition.

          • rah
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You questioned whether I was just spouting an opinion, which would imply that it was inaccurate.

            Would imply what was inaccurate?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Imagine if you contributed to the discussion rather than did a poor attempt at the Socratic Method…