Fear Mongering About Range Anxiety Has To Stop — CT Governor Calls Out EV Opponents::Several state governors are fighting fear mongering as they attempt to reduce transportation emissions in their states.

  • jabjoe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Years ago, I, a brit, was in Austin Texas for 7 weeks for work. During that time I thought it would good to go see New Orleans. I was like “I’ll just jump on a train and read and sleep until I’m there.” This what I had done in Europe. I had my error explained. So I drove. I mean, it was kind of interesting to see the different landscapes, but it was also really boring and time consuming. Basically got there, spent a few hours, and had to turn round and drive back.

    Why the hell doesn’t the US have a passenger train network??

    • limelight79@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      We do, it’s just very limited. Actually in Austin I think you could have pulled it off. You could have taken the Texas Eagle to San Antonio, then the Sunset Limited to New Orleans. It would have taken 27 hours and the Sunset Limited only runs 3 times a week, so if you departed Monday at 6:30 pm you’d be in NO Tuesday at 9:40 pm. Bon Voyage!

      Just kidding. As a rail fan, it bugs me, too. My wife and I spent two weeks in Germany, visiting multiple cities, and we used a private car once (a relative gave us a ride) and a taxi once. Otherwise it was all trains and the occasional city bus, plus one motorcoach that took us to Neuschwanstein. It was pretty nice.

      • jabjoe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It was a bit of a culture shock to be honest.

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          There are spots where it’s much brighter - for example, between Boston and Washington, DC, there is quite a bit of rail service, with departures frequently from each endpoint and cities in between (Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York, etc.). It’s higher speed than most passenger rail in the country, but not “high speed” in the sense of Europe or Japan.

          I’ve gone from Baltimore to Philly that way a few times, and it’s pretty nice…and it’s busy.

          A private company recently introduced service in Florida with semi-high speed trains that runs from Miami to Orlando. That seems to be pretty popular as well. And some cities (New York and Chicago, for example) have an extensive network of commuter rail.

          • jabjoe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve used the NY subway before. It’s the kind of thing you’d want for all cities. I’ve passed through Chicago and saw the trams, but didn’t get to go one. They looked great at least. Most US cities I’ve been to have just felt like sprawl where driving is only option. Often where it seamed there was no real centre to go to anyway.

            The US is so big it’s amazing it doesn’t have good fast rain connecting it all. A wave of rail building could do wonders. Cities without a centre would end up growing one at the rail hub. You could then de-car that centre, make it somewhere to go.

            • limelight79@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well, keep in mind some of those cities are thousands of miles apart - New York to Los Angeles is about 2,800 miles (4,500 km). While I believe we should have a robust rail network, it’s tough to justify it for that kind of distance given that planes are so much faster.

              In my mind we’d have a three tiered approach - cities would have subways, busses, and commuter rail options. Nearby cities, say, less than 500 miles (800 km) apart, would have high speed rail connections. Longer trips would be handled by airliners. Because, lets face it, no one is going back to land transportation between New York and LA - even at 250 km/hr, a train would take 18 hours - and that’s nonstop, whereas a flight is 6 hours. Few people are going to be willing to triple the travel time like that.

              So, in my world we’d have a cohesive transportation plan that focuses each mode for what they are best at. I’d still want a good nationwide rail network as a fallback (in case of, say, a 9/11 type event where the airline network is shut down), but I think it has to be bigger than just rail.

              This would reduce the issue of a busy air traffic network as well, by removing short haul flights in favor of trains.

              • jabjoe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                All sounds good and a real improvement to now.