• JoBo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The idea gets raised periodically here, especially since the huge drop in turnout starting in 1997.

    There’s a Research Briefing on it in the Commons Library.

    I haven’t read it but it’s a terrible idea. Just another way for the parties to avoid having to offer anything worth voting for.

    • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really. Plus we have alot more independents/minor parties due to our preferential voting system that people can vote for. What it does is forces people to are more about politics and policy

      • Lafari@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it forces a lot of idiots to just pick a box when they aren’t informed on politics at all. Probably skews the numbers a bit tbh.

    • relevants@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t read it but it’s a terrible idea.

      “Yeah sure I don’t know what I’m talking about, but here’s my strong opinion anyways”

      • JoBo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I haven’t read this specific report, that doesn’t mean I’m making shit up on the spot.

        No one has yet explained why Australia has a far-right party called Liberal and a centre-right party called Labor. Compulsory voting is why, IMO.