The chat was allegedly created by a group of 8th-grade students and involved some of the juveniles expressing “hateful and racist comments" and a mock slave auction.

The chat was allegedly created by a group of 8th-grade students and involved some of the juveniles expressing “hateful and racist comments" and a mock slave auction.

Six juveniles in Massachusetts were charged in a racial online bullying incident that involved “heinous” language, threats of “violence toward people of color” and a mock slave auction, the district attorney for Hampden County said.

Students from Southwick, about 104 miles southwest of Boston, allegedly participated in a “hateful, racist online” Snapchat discussion between Feb. 8 and Feb. 9, Hampden District Attorney Anthony Gulluni said in a statement on Facebook.

Gulluni said he became aware of the incident on Feb. 15 and immediately called on the Massachusetts State Police Detective Unit to investigate.

On Thursday, at the conclusion of the investigation, the district attorney authorized members of the Detective Unit and the Chief of the Juvenile Court Unit to pursue criminal charges against the juveniles.

  • JoBo
    53·
    9 months ago

    It does seem vanishingly unlikely, yes. For all the reasons already given.

    Certainly too soon to be demanding they be let off with a pat on the head.

    • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
      42·
      9 months ago

      They have been suspended from school without a trial, for a crime which didn’t happen at school.

      I’m sure the retaliation-only US justice system will work wonders, can’t have the private prison industry lose money after all.

      • JoBo
        31·
        9 months ago

        Oh no, suspended for bullying. So cruel, making them face the consequences of their actions. You should go on hunger strike or something, to highlight the plight of these poor little angels.

        • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
          12·
          9 months ago

          You’re arguing in bad faith and putting words in my mouth

          Suspending students from school for weeks, while protecting the victims temporarily from contact, has the side effect of withholding education from children. Surely they won’t miss anything important while suspended for 4-8 weeks, it’s not like education (or rather the lack thereof) and crime has a strong correlation.

          Any justice system should have these priorities:

          1. Protecting current victim(s)
          2. Preventing future victimizations.
          3. Rehabilitating the perpetrator(s)

          The U.S. justice system sole priority is bloodlust. That’s part of the reason police brutality goes largely ignored: it only affects “criminals” and they deserve it anyway.

          Now: how does the “tough on crime” attitude of the prosecution as reflected in the article protect current or future victims for more than a few months?