As an enthusiast that takes portraits, travel, some macro, some wildlife, and a desire to do more sports and birding; I’ve always wanted to upgrade my SL1 to a full frame sensor/mirrorless.

Price is a big deal for me, and I want to buy once cry once–i want a camera that will last me the next 8+ years. Reviews on the RP look great, and I don’t pretend to be an expert–im confused though, because while the R6 mkii has a few nice features I can’t see why it costs twice as much. Is the R6 mkii worth the upgrade, and/or will it be more future proof?

  • ianovic69
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with M43 for birds and the OM-1 for sports. That’s an extraordinary camera although it’s twice the price of the R10 with a lens.

    The Canon closed system isn’t really a problem though. The two lenses mentioned are good enough for anything and well worth the money.

    The overall value of the whole kit makes it very competitive and the impression I had from the OP was that budget is important.

    There’s also the added familiarity with Canon that shouldn’t be underestimated.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s also the added familiarity with Canon that shouldn’t be underestimated.

      As a tech nerd who tends to pick up new user interfaces quickly, I may underestimate that factor for other people. I think any newer mirrorless is going to be vastly different from a decade-old entry-level DSLR though.

      • ianovic69
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a testament to Canon that their menus and ergonomics are so much better than most other makes that they are so easy to use, regardless of age.