Are you guys fine with these new shenanigans from Github. I found a bug and wanted to check what has been the development on that, only to find out most of the discussion was hidden by github and requesting me to sign-in to view it.

It threw me straight back to when Microsoft acquired Github and the discussions around the future of opensource on a microsoft owned infrastructure, now microsoft is exploiting free work from the community to train its AI, and building walls around its product, are open source contributors fine with that ?

  • rah
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Patch Theory

    The way you write about this seems very evangelical.

    patches, without depending patches that would cause a conflict, should commute

    get stuck in their rebases/pulls

    I use git every day and I don’t recall patch ordering ever being a problem.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Evangelical in that it’s documented as a theory & a paper for the concepts you can read about? Communicative properties are common in math–what’s novel is applying those properties to patches for source control compared to the older models.

      I use git every day and I don’t recall patch ordering ever being a problem

      Have you worked in a distributed team sharing just patches over email? If Alice pulls from Bob & then Catherine, but David reads & applies Catherine’s then Bob’s, Alice & David now have a conflict in the ordering when trying to push/pull later. I have ran into this. Or did you use a centralized, canonical (therefore not distributed) Git server with a pull request model? If you do the latter, you won’t run into the issue but you also aren’t using the distributed part of a distributed version control system (DVCS)–& most don’t since has too many issues with snapshot-based tools. This restricts the sorts of systems & team structures for source control we can even do (you need a Tvoralds dictator even for Linux’s mailing list) & we can’t really think outside the snapshot-limitations until we step outside of that snapshot bubble.

      • rah
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Evangelical in that it’s documented as a theory & a paper for the concepts you can read about?

        No, evangelical as in needing to tell people about it, even when they have no interest.

        Have you worked in a distributed team sharing just patches over email?

        No.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          https://feddit.uk/comment/8692603

          You literally asked what I suggested. And I’m trying to do my due diligence in raising awareness for ideas I find compelling since these alternatives have yet to be any many folks’ radars …VCSs that solve issues you have yet to run into, but might someday & now you might remember you once heard about a solution online.