Dangerous opinion, I’ve recently moved to Fedora after Ubuntu and after customising it on the GNOME desktop, it’s literally Ubuntu (But better) in every way except no snaps.

Personally as someone who got the ground running using Ubuntu as my 1st Linux distro, fedora is a comfortable transfer and I really like their spins.

Sure DNF can be slow but you can fix that and sure redhat can be a little… difficult with their decisions.

What do you think of Fedora? So far I enjoy the stability combined with near-arch levels of getting new updates!

  • Aggravationstation
    7·
    7 months ago

    it’s literally Ubuntu (But better) in every way except no snaps.

    That would be Debian, friend.

      • Aggravationstation
        1·
        7 months ago

        True. I can’t understand why anyone would choose having the newest features over stability. But each to their own.

        • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
          2·
          7 months ago

          Not just newest features, newest documentation, bug fixes, and optimizations as well. When I started with Linux, I had many issues that were further exasperated by finding answers for newer versions of software. Nowadays my servers run debian!

        • ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca
          1·
          7 months ago

          This looks like a fallacy in the argument. Ubuntu is generally known as being very stable as well, they tend to avoid breaking changes over the lifetime of a release and there are LTS releases to boot.