Reflecting on some of the hurdles for procuring a Fediverse instance for the US Government. There are a lot of hoops to jump through, but is it worthwhile?

In response to Joe Biden and the White House enabling ActivityPub federation via Threads, a number of people asked: “Why didn’t the White House just self-host their own Mastodon server?”

Here’s some very basic musings on what it would take for that to happen. and what some of the hurdles are. Don’t consider it a definitive answer, but a jumping-off point.

  • jg1i@lemmy.worldEnglish
    271·
    8 months ago

    I was wondering the same thing. It seems more proper to run a separate government Mastodon server. Otherwise, they’re showing preferential treatment to one company.

    Although… they probably can’t handle self hosting? But really? The all mighty US can’t self host a server?

    • Neato@ttrpg.networkEnglish
      142·
      8 months ago

      They’d just pay a contractor to stand up a server on azure or AWS. Most of the labor would be moderation which is probably why they won’t do it.

      They couldn’t remove anything without Republicans crying censorship. And because it’s government run, first amendment protections apply. Which means they couldn’t remove a lot of what moderators already do.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.eeEnglish
        5·
        8 months ago

        remove anything

        Uh, a US Government mastodon server wouldn’t have any way to sign up and comment. I assume it would be all one way announcements.

        Who cares about randos who want to talk to the president? People were posting dead bodies on Biden’s announcements on Threads.

    • FlaxEnglish
      11·
      8 months ago

      Other governments have done it, even the BBC have as well