• Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    The real problem is that ai will never ever be able to make art without using content copied from other artists which is absolutely plagiarism

    • SleepyPie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      But an artist cannot be inspired without content from other artists. I don’t agree to the word “copied” here either, because it is not copying when it creates something new.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, unless they lived in a cave with some pigments, everyone started by being inspired in some way.

        • Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          But nobody’s starts by downloading and pulling elements of all living and dead artists works without reference or license, it is not the same.

          • SleepyPie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m sure many artists would love having ultimate knowledge about all art relevant to their craft - it just hasn’t been feasible. Perhaps if art-generating AI could correctly cite their references it would be more acceptable for commercial use.