• TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    well my point was that obscure software is “often” (in my experience) packaged only in GURU, while void has official packages. My guess is that it is because GURU is official-ish while void has no such thing so there is bigger “pressure” to build binaries.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I didn’t look much into void, but when I did, gentoo’s repository is much larger and there are many packages that I’d call obscure that happen to be in the main repos.

      The situations I’ve had to reach to guru are rare. I bet that gentoo has more obscure stuff in its main repo, though I don’t have the numbers to prove it.

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I also don’t have any numbers. It was anecdotal evidence, I’m sure your experience is different. I mean it probably doesn’t even matter whether it’s source based because these obscure packages should compile pretty fast anyways.

        idk I guess my initial argument should be changed to something like “each does some things differently, one might prefer one or the other, in my experience void does binary packages a bit better although it doesn’t really matter tbh”