• evranch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Anecdotally pills can also alter behaviour and personality somewhat. Especially the megadose hormones like Depo-provera, that stuff messed up a girl I was dating long ago. Turned her into an emotional wreck. I would actually support not a ban, but warnings and restrictions on that particular product.

    I’ve always felt that choices like the Mirena IUD should be promoted over systemic hormones, my ex-wife was very happy with them over the years and we agreed we’ll be offering our daughter the option as soon as she gets her first period. For some reason they seem to push the Pill instead.

    I know some people have issues with IUDs but if they work for you they really work. Her hormones changed and she went asexual after kids, but she still maintains an IUD just for the greatly diminished cramping and bleeding.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There are non-hormonal IUDs to but apparently they aren’t as effective, at least according to my SIL and my new niece (I know that’s a sample of one but I’m pretty sure I know at least other unexpecteds as a result of copper IUD)

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The hormones in Mirena are in a low enough dosage that they only affect the uterine lining rather than have a systematic effect. It’s the clear choice as non-hormonal (i.e. copper) have the opposite side effect profile. Heavy periods, cramping, other undesirable effects

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just FYI, before you offer it to your kid, please do significant research. They’re constantly getting better, so by then it may be fine, but non hormonal IUDs have been linked with hella scarring in the past.

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        We did a ton of research when my wife first got one, I studied biochem so figured I could assess the situation fairly well.

        Non-hormonal are awful and I wouldn’t recommend them to anyone. Mirena on the other hand does release hormones, but in small enough quantity that the effects are basically topical - localized to the uterus and serum concentrations are barely affected compared to pills or shots.

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I brain farted and thought mirena was the copper one. Thank god, I thought you were super attached to giving an eleven year old a non hormonal iud. I had a state university clinician tell me that I was a conspiracy theorist for thinking there could be scarring and straight up pressure me to let her insert it, so I assume someone out there is recommending them to people.

          • evranch@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yikes, I can’t imagine who would recommend copper unless someone had a bad reaction to the hormonal type. The mode of action is totally different, with hormonal suppressing the whole cycle and copper being more like a continuous abortion.

            My wife didn’t have a period for years aside from some occasional spotting with Mirena, I figure if we can save my daughter a decade of cramping and bleeding by offering her one young, the birth control is almost a happy side effect.