• In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app’s founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What’s next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app’s founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle’s photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app’s full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    nah man, even the concept of self-segration by sex feels severely outdated in 2024. Just don’t do that, it’s not very hard.

    • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do you think that men and women don’t have their own unique set of problems and might want to speak just amongst themselves about it?

      I am deliberately not picking a side on the trans thing because I don’t care what you call yourself: man, woman, pink and purple candystriping mud licker.

      However to assume that cis and trans lives are the same is just incorrect.

      Trans people have much different problems and so do cis people.

      Everyone is looking at this the wrong way to me, the social groups really just seem like a form of group therapy to me.

      You meet up and talk about problems that you are all experiencing.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nothing in this implies that there are any benefits in segregation. In fact I’d argue that diverse groups are much more likely to solve problems successfully.

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          People don’t like being vulnerable in front of everyone, that’s why we have group instead of “stand on the corner, revealing your vulnerability to everyone.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That has nothing to do with the current topic. You can still have groups of people with common interests and goals without segregating yourself by one variable 🙄

              • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Nah we know for a fact that self segregation has no value in a healthy society. Instead of applying this pointless bandaid it’s better to educate and raise up the society to a more healthy level.

                • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’ll tell you what, you go find a bunch of rape survivors and then tell them they have to accept anyone into their group and talk in front of them.

                  Lmk how that works