• Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If and only “if” this split occur. Unfortunately only few tech conscious people about the importance of free internet as a whole and privacy will adhere to it. Will not be a big movement to harm the core of the big tech.

    • wewbull
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no split if chrome works on everything and Firefox works on half of stuff.

      Firefox just gets labelled as broken.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My perspective on this is that it’s about sustainability as opposed to trying to compete with big tech in a zero sum game. For example, Mastodon or Lemmy aren’t able to compete with commercial platforms in terms of users, but that doesn’t mean they’re not viable communities. I can see a future where there’s a niche open internet that exists independently of the commercial one and I think that would be fine. As long as there are enough people to do development on platforms and browsers and to produce content, that’s all that really matters. In fact, a split might even be better because then we wouldn’t have companies interfering with how the network operates.