• zerodown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    7 months ago

    I did IT for a school district and staying on top of proxies was a game of whack a mole. I’d do it because I was asked too, but kids will find a new proxy that works. And the little bastards are more clever than we give them credit for.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah you’re asking a handful of people who split their time across multiple duties to play cat and mouse with hundreds of teens who have copious free time they can dedicate to finding new proxies.

      Not to mention, all it takes is one advanced student setting up their own proxies on something like a free tier oracle cloud VPS and you’re never going to win.

      • lunachocken@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Me when i figured out I can just run an exe from a zip and casually plays Minecraft. Then sets up a socks 5 proxy using danted on guess what, a free Oracle server.

        Was quite tempting to live boot an ubuntu but then I’d have to reset the cmos.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          When I was in highschool the security was so poor that I was able to create a Visual Basic program that just moved the file with the system security information info another folder. I’d receive a system error that I can’t move the file, but the file would still move. Then I’d reboot into default security settings with nothing locked out. At the end of class I’d just move the file back and reboot again to restore the system.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 months ago

      I remember when I was in high school many many moons ago, my buddy set up a proxy through his own server. (This dude was a genius for a high schooler, he was MSCE+Security certified before graduating).

      We thought we were hot shit. We used it for a few weeks. Then one day we got called into a meeting with the district’s IT department. Turns out they knew we were using it all along, but didn’t care because we were mostly using it to browse gaming sites. But then this dipshit kid saw us using it, copied the URL without our knowledge, and used it to browse porn. So they had to shut us down and punished us. No network access for a month. (That kid lost computer access for the rest of the semester and failed a computer class he was taking. Serves him right.)

    • Jeanschyso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      They have lots of time and motivation, as well as zero shits to give about getting caught. It’s Actually a pretty good thing that kids are trying to bypass security because it naturally teaches them problem solving in a novel way

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      And the little bastards are more clever than we give them credit for.

      I watched a really great documentary about the game Oregon Trail, and one of the first bug fixes they needed to add was preventing kids from putting in a negative number when purchasing things which resulted in an infinite money glitch. The developer was amused that the kids figured this out.

      I also learned that Prince was in the same middle school where the alpha version of the game was tested in 1972, which is pretty neat.

      Here’s the video if anyone’s interested

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    7 months ago

    Survey data show how these inequities play out. The Center for Democracy and Technology asked teachers last year whether internet filtering and blocking can make it harder for students to complete assignments. Among teachers in schools with high rates of poverty, 62 percent said yes; among teachers in schools with lower rates, 50 percent said the same.

    So neither students nor teachesr like it?

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    7 months ago

    In my school in Germany, all computers were always set up in a way such that the teacher could look at any screen immediately. If a minor accesses a porn site, they’ll tell you by giggling, so what’s the need for filtering, anyway?

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      7 months ago

      The US education system is a complete trainwreck. The teachers are underpaid to the point it should be criminal, and as a consequence many of the teachers are also poorly educated themselves and a lot of them are also technically illiterate as a consequence. IT departments are also underfunded, and what technical training and support they should be providing to teachers often doesn’t happen. This isn’t universal of course, there are highly educated and technically literature teachers, but they’re few and far between.

      Even worse the invasion of school boards by both the MAGA cult and Karens has turned schools into political battlegrounds where oftentimes the most successful teachers aren’t the ones who are skilled at teaching, but the ones who are best at politicking and sucking up to administration.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      My school in the US had that too, but I don’t think any of the teachers even knew about it because they never used it.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing with filtering porn is that it does not work. Full stop. DuckDuckGo proxies images served in the image results, and startpage has a literal webpage proxy. Not to mention the Internet Archive.

  • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    They’ve been doing this since the 2000s. I remember having to set up a proxy server at home just so I could connect to it and actually browse the Internet at school without every third site being blocked for no reason.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is what happens when the schools are so broke that instead of getting proper IT they have to get the cheapest blocker possible and then just dial up the blocking to 11.

  • joel_feila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Same old same old. I remember back when some schools blocked Wikipedia article on Dick Chaney. Why the porn blocker would block any url with dick in it.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Missouri wanted those sites blocked, and the kids who are now vulnerable to suicide are the kind those people don’t want living anyway.

    Fuck MISERY!

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    They also block adblockers (at least in my area). So I’m trying to find a good laptop for my sister to use next year.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      In case it helps you, I’ve found that the uMatrix extension has been a great way to auto-block all Javascripts while still being able to permit just the ones needed to work past a site or network’s limitations.

      There’s a little bit of a learning curve at first, but nothing too bad. Using the extension also feels empowering, because it gives you much more control than just a flat ‘block everything’ anti-ad approach.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        No the thing is, the school district in my area uses Chromebooks and they’re locked down to the point you can’t download extensions or use another browser.

            • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s a great question and I wish I knew the answer to. Apparently, only DDG got blocked as Education/Science, Startpage was blocked as security.proxy, Bing for no specific reason and several Google variations (.ca, .nl, fr, etc) blocked as “App Defender”.

              The more I look into it, the more I’m left wondering who the fuck created the blocklists. The Social Media category has several instances of sites that are anything but any form of social media or social network

          • einlander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            7 months ago

            “The moon landing was a hoax” , “we shouldn’t be funding people to stare out into space”, “What has NASA ever done for us”, and other favorite GOP tunes.

            • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              7 months ago

              Aside from the “moon landing was a hoax”, I’ve seen democrats express similar sentiments about NASA. At least until I point out that a lot of our modern technology is based on stuff either developed directly by NASA or for NASA by a government contractor. That and the fact that NASA is one of the most, if not the most, profitable US agencies. Like, iirc NASA provides a 6x return for every dollar spent on them. As such, I find it really strange that the US is determined to keep NASA’s funding at a minimum when we could be using them to generate a lot of money for the economy.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          All sites are categorized. Which categories are blocked is up to the administrator.

            • biffnix@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Categories such as “education” are useful for limiting access for specific groups of devices. For example, if one class has a particularly mischievous group who keep going off task from their devices, rules can be created to whitelist certain categories, and only pass traffic that are in these more straightforward categories. Just FYI.

        • biffnix@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I work in K12 IT, and the reason is that all manner of categories are defined for both blacklisting and whitelisting when creating content filter rules. So while “education” would not be used for blocking, it would be useful for rules to apply to specific defined groups or devices which can only access specific categories (such as education). Just FYI.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I didn’t think I needed “protection” from anything on the Internet at all when I was a minor.

    My stance has not changed merely because I am no longer personally affected. I still think that it is completely stupid to want to keep any information at all from young people in the first place.