The rural city of Grants Pass in southern Oregon has become the unlikely face of the nation’s homelessness crisis as its case over anti-camping laws goes to the U.S.

The scenes were emblematic of the crisis gripping the small, Oregon mountain town of Grants Pass, where a fierce fight over park space has become a battleground for a much larger, national debate on homelessness that has reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

The town’s case, set to be heard April 22, has broad implications for how not only Grants Pass, but communities nationwide address homelessness, including whether they can fine or jail people for camping in public. It has made the town of 40,000 the unlikely face of the nation’s homelessness crisis, and further fueled the debate over how to deal with it.

“I certainly wish this wasn’t what my town was known for,” Mayor Sara Bristol told The Associated Press last month. “It’s not the reason why I became mayor. And yet it has dominated every single thing that I’ve done for the last 3 1/2 years.”

Officials across the political spectrum — from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in California, which has nearly 30% of the nation’s homeless population, to a group of 22 conservative-led states — have filed briefs in the case, saying lower court rulings have hamstrung their ability to deal with encampments.

  • capem@startrek.website
    41·
    7 months ago

    Personally, if I was homeless and found out I’m now in debt from the greedy-fuckers who put me there…

    I would just take the law into my own hands at that point.

    • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
      210·
      7 months ago

      Idk how it is in your country but here it’s very common to see homeless people being homeless by their own fault.

      But yes, if someone else gets you there, you have nothing to lose.

      • Entropywins@lemmy.world
        3·
        7 months ago

        Often, at the surface all you’ll see is someone being homeless through their own actions. Take a peak a little closer and you’ll see that we all failed them collectively. The biggest difference I’ve noticed between housed and unhoused isn’t the amount of trauma/violence/abuse they’ve suffered its the amount of support around them that made the difference in life trajectory.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        2·
        7 months ago

        Regardless of how they hit there, how is it useful for anyone to attempt to fine someone for having nothing? Seems like just a pretense to jail people

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          1·
          7 months ago

          There is political pressure from our corporate prison companies to fill their beds, so they can get their tasty government stipend. Indeed, jailing them is beneficial to both parties involved as it “solves” the homeless issue for the govt and makes money for the bribery donation class citizens they serve.