That doesn’t cut it; a purely semantic argument from an academic stance is cowardly and impotent. All “gods” and their related cults are an intrinsic obstacle to human development as a species. Don’t even get me started on the systemic exploitation of the mentally/emotionally vulnerable, or unchecked sexual predation on children. Fuck your religion, every religion. Full stop.
So you consider that to be an ‘elucidated statement’ about ignosticism:
Ignosticism or igtheism is the idea that the question of the existence of God is meaningless because the word “God” has no coherency and an ambiguous definition.
I love how you describe their well elucidated statement as ignorant when the exact opposite is true.
So you consider that to be an ‘elucidated statement’ about ignosticism:
lol- you’re even funnier than the first guy!