I am SO sorry I had a source that published one moderately misleading article about GMOs 8 years ago. /s
People love linking that article to debunk my Truthout stuff. I’m not a huge supporter of them but their articles seem well written in my experience. One slightly inaccurate article years ago shouldn’t discredit anything they do.
I’ve read it in the past because inevitably someone links to it when I post a Truthout article. It claims they are “mixed” in their factual reporting but the only real evidence is one older article
I am SO sorry I had a source that published one moderately misleading article about GMOs 8 years ago. /s
People love linking that article to debunk my Truthout stuff. I’m not a huge supporter of them but their articles seem well written in my experience. One slightly inaccurate article years ago shouldn’t discredit anything they do.
Did you even read that link?
It’s not negative
I’ve read it in the past because inevitably someone links to it when I post a Truthout article. It claims they are “mixed” in their factual reporting but the only real evidence is one older article
You realize that we try to put a MBFC link on most news articles?
I’ve seen them on everything, and if you find one without please feel free to throw the link up for that site.
I post on this community and others, typically 20+ posts per day. I can’t remember when I saw one on a source that wasn’t Truthout lol.
Idk how you miss them.
The fediverse news articles are how I found out about them.
Honestly they were annoying at first with how often I saw them