• rndll@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only reason I haven’t switched to Firefox from Chrome fully is because for some reason Firefox for Android still doesn’t have tabs for large screen devices. Mozilla says it’s not a priority. 🤷

        • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it really sucks. I am in the same boat. Samsung Internet on my tablet; really wish I had FF on it.

        • No1@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Firefox for Android removing the ability to open local html files killed it for me. Currently on Vivaldi.

          • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            If that’s your only gripe with it, you can still access them by using one of the simple web servers available running inside Termux, that will also allow you to avoid CORS related problems, in fact it is the currently suggested method on MDN

            • No1@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, nah. I’ve already got enough unnecessary apps and services with Android.

              Thanks for the workaround, though.

              • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean you’d be running the server only when actually needed, but I understand it is a bit of a hassle to do every time as well

            • No1@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It was because of ‘security’, which was never explained. And it doesn’t make much sense when other browsers can and do alow it. I’ll see if I can dig up some historical links if I remember tomorrow.

              Last time I checked,there was still no acknowledgement of it and appeared to be no intention of ever addressing it. The fact that they’re now telling people to run a webserver suggests that nothing has changed ☹️

        • Nioxic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So use edge

          Its chrome-based… but at least its not brave, and the adblocker(which is off by default…) is decent enough

          • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you think the things brave has done are bad, go read through the list of things microsoft has done. You really don’t want them to ever have a browser again, and certainly don’t want to personally use it.

      • Bri Guy @sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used Brave for a few years but recently switched to LibreFox. I really enjoyed Brave as a browser but couldn’t handle all the sketchy shit that seems to keep coming up

        • Pooptimist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really enjoy the chromium grouping of tabs. So much so that’s it’s almost a deciding factor for which browser I choose. I hope Firefox adds that feature soon, so the switch back feels easier

          • brrn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Try the Simple Tab Groups addon for Firefox. I’ve been using it for years and prefer it to any other tab grouping now.

        • Pooptimist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really enjoy the chromium grouping of tabs. So much so that’s it’s almost a deciding factor for which browser I choose. I hope Firefox adds that feature soon, so the switch back feels easier

      • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same. I had no idea about brave and I started using it full time on all my devices like a month ago. Guess I’m going back to Firefox. Which was fine.

    • envious92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve switched on Desktop a year ago. Also with Android. But Firefox on Android has an odd bug that I cannot get rid of. Pages are really slow to load on initial render. I’ve noticed it gets stuck on the SSL cert verification step, sometimes around 5 to 10 seconds before it starts painting the page.

      I’ve tried disabling all add-ons, logging out of Firefox sync, disabling the built in HTTPS everywhere, and literally any custom settings I’ve added. But I can’t get past this issue and seemingly no one else has it.

      Chrome doesn’t present this issue.

      • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup got the same thing. Annoying as hell. The loading bar always goes to like quarter of the way and stays there for a couple of seconds and the continues. After that it’s fine, but it is always the first page you load after closing Firefox.

      • br3d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never encountered this, which makes me realise I’ve been running Firefox beta for ages (with zero issues). Perhaps try that just in case it helps?

      • AlecSadler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same issue here! I thought I was alone. It annoys me to no end and weirder still, issue doesn’t present itself with Firefox for Windows running behind the same IP.

        Firefox Focus also doesn’t seem to present the issue. Just the primary Firefox browser for Android. And honestly, often enough that it’s nearly unusable.

        If you ever figure it out, please let me know.

      • Nhof@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not alone, I’ve been using Firefox on Android for two years now, and I’ve had this problem from the beginning. The first time I launch Firefox and load a page it stops a quarter of the progression bar for ten seconds, and then loads fine. Once pas that everything works perfectly. It’s very annoying and I don’t know why this happens.

    • gullible@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unrelated, but why is it that so many kbin users seem to keep a dedicated reducing account? Relatively frequently, an account that reduces a post or comment has no recent posts or comments but heavy initial usage a ~month ago as jpgr above. It’s weird.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think those existed on Reddit too. It’s just that you could never actually confirm they existed.

        • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which was why they existed, as alts to upvote a user’s own posts and downvote opposing ones.

          Except now we’re on kbin, we can see them.

      • jpgr@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I downvoted because it was a lazy comment not providing further elaboration. If anything, the fact that such a comment is highly upvoted shows that this community is not mature yet.

        That I’m not engaging in online discussion doesn’t automatically mean this is a bot or “dedicated reducing” account. Please restrain yourself from judging strangers on the internet.

        • gullible@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In a space dominated by people endlessly sharing opinions and articles and memes, it’s just extremely peculiar to find accounts like yours so frequently downvoting while absent other activities even if it’s relatively mundane. Take, for instance, the upvotes on nothingwise’s comment where 1/5 are blank accounts. The novelty of the information sets off alarm bells, so I apologize if I was mistaken. I’m not trying to start a witch-hunt or JAQ off so I’ll leave it at that.

    • voxl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      On mac? Love safari? But also want good adblock? Use Orion! It’s safari, but with support for chrome and Firefox extensions! Fuck yeah!

      I always loved safari, and always got weird looks for it as a web developer (but after a month or two they love me for it because I always find non-chrome bugs because those peasants only use chrome), but that browser is so damn good guys… on mac, that is. Not sure if it even exists yet for linux/win.

      • nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Orion

        Thanks for the tip! Do you know any similar solution like this for iOS? I’m struggling to find a fully featured browser with decent ad-blocking capacity.

    • mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am using Brave on iOS mainly because of its superb YouTube support - It has a built in ad block, can download videos offline and play minimized. Is there any way I can achieve this with any other browser? I would switch immediately.

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t Firefox do telemetry and other shady shit out of the box? Ofc you can turn it off but I don’t get the fanaticism over this browser.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every now and then, you’ll see some journalist uncovering the great revelation that Mozilla is doing unthinkable things, but I have never these stories actually being relevant, if you do more research on the topic.

        Some examples:

        And telemetry by itself is not evil either. It depends entirely on what data is actually being sent. You can look at what Mozilla sends by typing “about:telemetry” into the URL bar. In my opinion, that is perfectly fine.

        Ultimately, though, they enjoy so much trust, because they have no profit motive. The Mozilla Foundation is legally a non-profit and the Mozilla Corporation is a 100% subsidiary of the Foundation, so cannot pay out profits to anyone either.

        Any ‘evil’ shit they do to make money, they do it to pay wages and to invest further into Firefox & their other projects.

        You can criticize that the CEO takes a salary she can’t possibly spend (yet is below industry-standard, to my knowledge). And you can argue whether they should be taking so much money from Google rather than other sources.

        But all in all, that still leaves them far above companies who need to exploit users as much as justifiable, to make the maximum amount of profit.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The fact that they have (at least for now) foregone implementing Manifest v3 should be reason enough to use Firefox. Turn their telemetry off and use ublock origin, call it a day well spent.

        If you’re inclined to, use Librewolf with ublock, NoScript, decentraleyes, and chameleon.

        Copy the bypasspaywalls sites into ublock, add a redirect extension to avoid all the idiot megacorps, and use duckduckgo lite and learn to use shebangs for very fast web searching.

      • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s not perfect out of the box but after turning off telemetry and adding some add-ons like ublock origin and such it’s one of the best short of going full on tor/mullvad. And still less fanaticism than brave lol

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      Firefox and mozilla aren’t your friend.

      They like to play the “user and privacy friendly” company. Meanwhile they are hemoraging users, and laying off staff needed to actually build a great browser.

      Mozilla ceo pay increase + layoffs in 2020:

      In 2018 she received a total of $2,458,350 in compensation from Mozilla, which represents a 400% payrise since 2008. On the same period, Firefox marketshare was down 85%. When asked about her salary she stated “I learned that my pay was about an 80% discount to market. Meaning that competitive roles elsewhere were paying about 5 times as much. That’s too big a discount to ask people and their families to commit to.”

      In 2020, after returning to the position of CEO, her salary had risen to over $3 million. In the same year the Mozilla Corporation laid off approximately 250 employees due to shrinking revenues. Baker blamed this on the Coronavirus pandemic.

      • cikano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t need to be my friend to be better than the chromium browsers though, so I don’t know what this has to do with anything

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        What’s the alternative though, we have Chrome and Firefox as choices. Chrome is far worse than some issues with Firefox around CEO pay.

    • ex_redditor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      With brave I never see any pc or YouTube ads. With Firefox even with ublock origin I can’t get rid of those damn ads. That’s what keeps me on brave

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which websites exactly do you still see ads on with ublock and not with Brave? Because I’ve not seen any ads in years with ublock.

      • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know why you’re getting ads… I run Firefox + uBlock just fine.

        But I also run NoScript and AdBlockPlus. Maybe try those?

        (Yes I know NoScript with uBlock is pretty redundant. Doesn’t really bother me to allow scripts on both to unbreak things. I like the double lock.)

        • kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You should not run multiple ad blockers. uBO won’t be able to defuse anti-adblocker scripts if it has another ad blocker interfering.

          OTOH NoScript should be fine

  • Raltoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    359
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The ceo is a bigoted asshole, Brave is chromium, it was initially funded by Peter Thiel and they’re literally just trying to make their own adsense network.

    The self-proclaimed privacy focused browser is tracking your browsing and want to serve you personalized ads, and I think they want to use that tracking data for AI training as well, meaning other people can potentially access it.

    And lets not forget about their crypto currency that you can earn by turning on special ads. Which they seemingly unironically called it “Basic Attent Tokens”…

    TL;DR: The company is basically a sham company trying to usher in a dystopia. Where you’ll get paid for staring at ads, while having all your data stolen and sold back to you.

  • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    237
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that their founder wants to ban gay marriage is enough reason for me to avoid it like the plague.

  • rog@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont know why anyone would leave chrome and land on something like brave.

    If youre ditching chrome, which you should, go to an actual different browser and use Firefox.

    • hayes_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personal anecdote:

      When I initially decided to drop Chrome, I moved to Brave because - as a chromium-based browser - it supported the same set of extensions I’d grown accustomed to.

      That being said, the crypto stuff weirded me out enough that, once I’d weaned myself off the extensions, I switched to Firefox.

      • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What extensions does chrome have which are useful that Firefox doesn’t?

        My only recurring issue with Firefox, which may have been fixed I dunno, is it for some reason it “isn’t officially supported” or whatever exact wording to use hardware security keys (like yubikey, which I use on every account that allows it). It’s only certain websites that don’t want to work though. Like google, Microsoft and many others were fine but I think paypal didn’t want to work properly but it does work on Edge, Chrome, probably Brave. Overall annoying as fuck at times but I deal with it to be out of Google’s-world

    • Anaralah_Belore223@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, if you going to completely ditch chrome/chromium, also stop using Electron apps (which have chromium/Chromium Embedded Framework on them!)

    • Cypher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Streaming services seem to lower bitrate when I’m using Firefox vs Brave, so Brave is my go to for streaming.

      I use Firefox for everything else.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Chromium has metric shit tons of work done that seems to perform great. What I would love to see is for Mozilla to fork Chromium, staff it with enough people to maintain it, add/remove the features they feel are appropriate/inappropriate, and thus reuse the tons of free work Google and others have already done. As a software engineer, I don’t buy the argument that it’s easier to correctly implement every new web feature anew than maintaining a fork. Every large org that ships anything based on Android for example maintains a fork of an even bigger codebase. It’s not as complicated as people make it out to be. It’s not a new problem and there are strategies to manage it. If Mozilla does this, they’ll be able to play an active role in steering by far the biggest rendering engine’s direction, instead of playing opposition with no stake in it. Now downvote away! 😄

      • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The more market share chrome based browsers have, the easier it is for google to inflict their agenda for the internet on everyone. If firefox didnt exist, every web developer would be optimizing their sites only for chrome, and responding quickly to any change google wants to make.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It really doesn’t matter what Firefox’es codebase is though. To a web developer it’s a black box. It may as well be COBOL. So long as enough people use it and it behaves differently to a web developer than Google’s Chromium or Chrome, the goal you mentioned is achieved. This is why I don’t buy this argument.

    • whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was using Chrome as a secondary because unfortunately “designed for Chrome” is a thing now, and got sick of Google’s bullshit and thought I was doing better by going to Brave. Unfortunately, it quickly became clear that Brave has its own large ethical holes.

    • mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am using Brave mainly because of its superb YouTube support - It has a built in ad block, can download videos offline and play minimized. Is there any way I can achieve this with any other browser? I would switch immediately.

    • chris2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve tried Firefox several times but always end up back on chromium due to compatibility; a lot of sites don’t play well with anything but chrome anymore and this is very much something intentionally caused by Google, who have basically taken a page out of Microsoft’s playbook but with a much more mature product that is going to be substantially harder to replace then IE was

    • exonac@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave is the only browser I know that can play youtube videos in the background on mobile. Please tell me another browser that can do that. The UX is just really good.

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Firefox and gecko are just not as smooth. I don’t know how you don’t notice this, especially on Android.

  • stooovie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have absolutely no idea how Brave got the reputation it has. It’s business model is disgusting and extortionate, it’s like paying for warez. Been clear as day since day one.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brave is a marching band of red flags. It claims privacy while injecting ads, affiliate codes and crypto into the browser. It’s kind of sad to see someone like Brendan Eich who should know better turn to the dark side and pretend this is all fine. It isn’t.

    Best advice I could give for anyone who wants privacy is use Firefox or a branch of it. Firefox is out of the box the most privacy conscious mainstream browser and add-ons make it more so. If you want absolute privacy you could even use a derivative like Tor Browser.

  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At one point they were scummy enough to automatically add their referral codes to any Amazon link you see. Lots of people today still mindlessly recommend Brave, and that’s what’s wrong in general with the “but the UX is so nice” mentality.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of people today still mindlessly recommend Brave

      It starts to feel astroturfed at a certain point. The last week or so has been crazy.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At one point they were scummy enough to automatically add their referral codes to any Amazon link you see.

      To be clear, that means Brave is ① invading their users’ privacy, and ② stealing money from web publishers.

      The point of referral codes is to reward web publishers for referring users to a product; leading to the user buying a product that they otherwise wouldn’t.

      Your browser isn’t introducing you to a product. For it to insert referral codes for the browser vendor’s benefit is stealing money.

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its almost like UX is one of the most important things for a user of any given program. 🥴

    • Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you really dig into the whole ordeal it was a software error, not some malicious idea to steal links from creators.

        • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of the stuff that happens on the backend of any software goes on “without your consent”.

          You clicked on a webpage.

          You were brought to that webpage.

          You weren’t tracked, logged, or had your data exploited or anything. All that happened was Brave got an affiliate bonus.

          Now if the companies in question were angry at Brave for doing that, I could understand. But why should we, the users, give a shit?

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You weren’t tracked, logged, or had your data exploited or anything. All that happened was Brave got an affiliate bonus.

            You seem to not know how affiliate links work. The products shopped are tracked & logged per user, and can be analyzed by the affiliate partner as to what their users were buying, i.e. data can be exploited.

            • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know a lot, so maybe you know more than me. The tracking and logging is via cookies, right?

              The same cookies that brave automatically blocks?

              Again, maybe they do some tracking via some other method that I don’t know about; I’m not an expert. But it seems to me that Brave was essentially scamming those companies by using their referral codes but denying them any useful data. Great for brave, sucks for the companies, shouldn’t matter to us.

              • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not necessarily via cookies. The referral links can be unique to a specific user.

      • _jonatan_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why the fuck should your browser get a share from your amazon shopping? It’s doubly galling since they pretend to care about user privacy.

  • CafecitoHippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, fuck this guy.

    First, I have been online for almost 30 years. I’ve led an open source project for 14 years. I speak regularly at conferences around the world, and socialize with members of the Mozilla, JavaScript, and other web developer communities. I challenge anyone to cite an incident where I displayed hatred, or ever treated someone less than respectfully because of group affinity or individual identity.

    So I hid my hatred from everyone for 30 years successfully. Now that everyone finds out that I donated to a cause to strip them of rights everyone wants to say I’m hateful? Give me one example where I displayed hatred…how about the time you donated to strip people of their rights? That might be a big one for me.

  • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that its main 2 gimmicks are a shitty ad blocker and integrated cryptocurrency should be enough of a red flag, honestly. Just use Firefox, people!

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the CEO is a raging alt-righter. Glad I never used his product then.

  • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the hateful browser

    Holy shit man imagine if we judged every huge project by one asshole at the top. There wouldn’t be a single thing to enjoy in this world.

    Edit:

    I am going to add more perspective to this, because holy shit people are so into eating nothing burgers.

    Reddit/Twitter was a database and API that everyone was centralized onto, there was no choice. Brave you can literally fork because its open source. Aside from that this was literally the CEO’s personal donation of $1000…in like 2014. Almost 10 yrs ago.

    Elon, as CEO and on the X/Twitter brand:

    Meanwhile Brendan:

    Gnubyte

  • ddnomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Use Firefox or Safari, the more people use Chromium-based browsers the faster we get to the situation where Google completely owns the Internet (and they almost do now).

  • tengkuizdihar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Vivaldi? Trusting a closed sourced application for privacy? What?

    Not even defending brave here, just weird that the author say that.

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Today I learned that people take it VERY PERSONALLY when you criticize their chosen browser. 😂