In video of the April 18 encounter, Frank Tyson can be seen lying motionless on the floor of a bar for more than 5 minutes before police check him for a pulse.

The Canton Police Department in Ohio has released body camera video from the night a 53-year-old man died after he repeatedly told officers “I can’t breathe” as he was handcuffed with his hands behind his back and he was pinned to the ground.

In video of the encounter on April 18, the man, Frank Tyson, can be seen lying motionless on the floor of a bar for more than 5 minutes before police check him for a pulse and about 8 minutes before CPR is started.

In the nearly 36-minute video, police respond to the scene of a single-car crash to find a downed power pole and an unoccupied vehicle with the driver’s side door open and an airbag deployed.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand why officers always ignore people when they ask for medical help. If someone says they can’t breath, that’s a clue that you should do something different, not leave them on the floor handcuffed.

    How is it that police are still trained to respond to situations this way? The negligence is obvious. This isn’t the same as what happened with George Floyd, but nonetheless very negligent.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s because they don’t see them as people, they see them as violent criminals that the world would be better off without.

      If you step into their shoes for a minute, and one of the criminals you just successfully took off of the streets said they can’t breathe, your first thought might be “good. Maybe that’ll teach you a lesson about doing crimes in my neighborhood.” Your second might be “I wish I could shoot you right now and get this over with, but maybe I’ll get lucky and I can say I didn’t hear you.”

      Note that the second one is inherently a stupid thought, there’s body cams. That kind of logic didn’t stop my 5-year-old from telling me she cleaned her room when I could easily check and find out she didn’t, and it won’t stop cops from fantasizing about everything working out here.

      That’s exactly why they do things that way. They’re living out a fantasy world where there are no real rules and there are no consequences, and they have to live a balancing act between indulging in that and dealing with reality. Sometimes cops fail to balance that, and that’s what we see here.

      As for who trains them, it’s their fellow cops. This isn’t a bunch of individual fantasies, these men work and train and talk together about how it’d be so much better if they had less restrictions and just talk about that hypothetical world. New cops who have any kind of racism or similar “My group is best” can join the conversation and add in their own unique version to the group fantasy. New cops who aren’t already racist, though, won’t hear blatant racism. No, they will just hear about crime stats and reoffending rates, about cops that died trying to deal with all the supposed crime, and about how stopping them is justice and will help everyone, not just cops. In time they’ll share the group fantasy, too, and stop seeing their victims as people. Occasionally someone just doesn’t join in the fantasy and they get bullied until they quit.

      This is why the easiest way to move forward from this kind of thing is to gut the police departments and start over, or we at least need bodycams that can’t be turned off so easily.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe, but it didn’t used to be this way even as recently as the 80s. And it isn’t like this in most other countries (at least the European ones km aware of).

        It’s a cultural thing, and training, and it can be fixed, we just have to want to fix it bad enough. No idea what will be the tipping point. George Floyd wasn’t enough, so I’m not sure what if anything will be. Or if we’ll just go deeper I to this police state mentality where everything is an us vs them situation.

        • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          What talking about cops Always been this way. Especially in the 80’s and 90’s when we didn’t have recordings devices. Remember Rodney King?

        • ickplant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Are you too young to remember the Rodney King protests? They literally had to call in the Marines and the Army to quell them. That was in 1991, and a result of police brutality against an unarmed Black man.

          Edit: Wanted to add that police in general came from slave patrols. It was a racist institution designed to instill terror into people of color from the very beginning. It was never about “serving and protecting.”

          • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was a kid back then, but even i had no idea of the background leading to the riots. Like how the group that beat King were part of a gang that was on a mission to beat black men, or the unrelated (except by racism) widely publicized trial verdicts where multiple white citizens were found not guilty or given light sentences for killing black kids (I’ve forgotten a lot of the details of the documentary, but ill never forget the shocked faces of the parents of a kid shot by a convenience store clerk after her community service verdict). The righteous anger had been boiling over all year, and King was just the final straw.

            And nothing has changed for the better in all this time

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, I was a baby in 1991. I don’t have data, but I’ve heard anecdotes from former police officers that police training has changed significantly since the 80s.

            It’s definitely become much more militarized.

            • ickplant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t disagree with that, but it would be false to say that police brutality directed at people of color is a new thing. That’s always been there.

              • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I never said police violence directed at people of color was a new thing.

                My point, which I think wasn’t very clear bcz I worded it poorly is that police are trained to draw their guns immediately today and shoot to kill. That didn’t used to be the case.

            • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The militarization accelerated due to events where the police took an ass whoopin like the North Hollywood bank robbery.

        • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Warrior training has taken like wildfire, they’re trained to do anything to survive and put into the mindset that if they don’t kill they will be killed.

        • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          There just wasn’t high definition evidence from the time youre thinking of. Give this 20 years and I bet any video recordings of average police behavior will be “deepfakes”.

          Nothing to see here citizen. Now pick up this can…

        • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s always happened. There just used to not be cameras all around all the time.

          Rodney King was the 90s George Floyd.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Training for police has changed. I don’t have the data but i read that many police are often trained by ex-military who are more skilled at (and therefore focus on) training soldiers to be an occupying force rather than as citizens policing each other

    • shadowSprite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      I used to be an EMT (am going to be working as one again soon) and where I worked we had some good cops and some real shitty cops who had no business being cops, but one thing that they all had in common was that the rules were if someone asked for medical help, they had to call the ambulance. Didn’t matter if it looked like obvious bullshit, all the departments in the area I worked had a blanket policy that they weren’t medical professionals and they couldn’t make that decision. You could have a tiny little cut on your finger and ask for medical help and even the shittiest cops would sigh and call for EMS. These cops infuriate me. How many more people have to get murdered? If someone asks for help fucking help them and sort out the details later.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t think it’s negligence.

      This reminds me of how California recently brought back police officers for “school security”.

      Did they remove the officers? No, the officers left in a hissy fit because the govt had the temerity to outlaw the use of this killer position on the kids (I believe enacted in the wake of George Floyd).

      Why leave for something like that? It makes sense. These are kids, right? It’s a position that kills, right? That’s what this article is showing us, again.

      You might assume the police relented because they like the govt money, right? I did too, but it was the govt who backed of, removing the law restricting the killer positions use.

      To me, the police depts collective action in California show that it is not negligence. In this case, it just doesn’t make… sense. The position is dangerous. The job is ostensibly protecting children, in a state sponsored school! It makes no sense that cops would care about one position so much…

      Seriously, I’ve been turning it over and over in my mind, it must be they care more about the precedent being set (and thus the possible loss of this power) than the safety of kids. And that’s the best motive i can think of.

      I don’t want people like that anywhere near kids or with the power to influence govt so much. This latest murder shows they care nothing for the people they “protect and serve” only for the power they’re allowed to wield.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did you even read the article? This was a case of very clear negligent.

        they care nothing for the people they “protect and serve” only for the power they’re allowed to wield

        Yes, there’s literally a Supreme Court case stating that police have no obligation to protect and serve. Why are you ranting at me about something very off topic?

        I understand people are just overall frustrated, but this entire comment you made has nothing to do with the article, or this particular police interaction.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t believe that for a second. People get into policing for all kinds of reasons. But the common denominator is that the barrier to entry is very low these days, and they expect to be hiring people with intelligence below a certain level. It has been explicitly stated as such by a number of police departments around the country.

        When your entire workforce is filled with grunts just following orders they don’t generally have the best critical thinking skills.

        Are there some people who get into it for the reason you mentioned, probably. But, if you think everybody joining the police is doing it for that reason, you’re sorely mistaken.

        • drphungky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Totally agree police departments need better candidates but that intelligence thing is not true at all. The one case that started that rumor was just a police department doing age discrimination against a candidate, and covering their asses in the lawsuit by using intelligence because it’s not a protected class. It was never about intelligence - it was age discrimination.

          What police departments need is better training, a smaller mandate (i.e., mental health professionals need to be called to those types of events), and a big enough cultural change that normal people at least consider doing the job, like firefighters.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t understand why officers always ignore people when they ask for medical help.

      Not to appear to be defending the cops, but I would expect a lot of people who are being arrested for legitimate reasons (and again, I’m not talking about this specific case) are motivated to lie to the police in an attempt to get out of the situation.

      • drphungky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also they clearly didn’t take this guy seriously since he was yelling, “They want to kill me!” before they even touched him. They probably thought he was crying wolf. Better training would mean they wouldn’t have used an illegal hold and killed him, they’d probably have taken him seriously if they knew the dangers at that particular moment in time…plus with better training over a long enough period of time people wouldn’t be as scared of the cops in the first place so there wouldn’t be any miscommunication. It’s still clearly the fault of modern policing but you can understand why it happened at least. Super tragic.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wh2spkbaARA

      Just … jump to some random parts of that video. Or this…

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3WPNj3IuOOE

      Or even this…

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=863aE25HQ5M

      It’s because plenty of people in the general public lie, take advantage, abuse any angle they can.

      I don’t agree with officers delaying CPR and pulse checks, they absolutely should be looking for genuine signs of distress or injury… But, I get why their faith in humanity is trashed to the point they don’t actually expect to find anything.

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Police are cowards and bullies. They treat everyone as a suspect rather than a human.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They really don’t. My cousin married a cop, my brother is a volunteer fire fighter that regularly has to interact with them, a good friend of mine is an ex-cop turned IT guy, the guy who lives across the street from me is a cop, I’ve also had interactions with random officers at coffee shops here in Akron and at a few events.

          My hot take is most of them would rather live and let live unless you’re doing something monumentally stupid or they get a call.

          And yeah, I’ve also met some douchebags on power trips, but “ACAB” is a failed and ridiculously confrontational movement. You’re never going to get anywhere near the reforms we need to see in policing with the ACAB or “fuck the police” mentality.

          • juicy@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure, they’re nice until they’re on the job, having a bad day, decide you’re a “bad guy” due to whatever biases or circumstances they find you in, get angry or frightened and snap and kill you as we’ve seen over and over and over again.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            We’ve had very different experiences with police officers. It’s my personal interactions with police over the years that’s given me a very low opinion of them. Then I saw someone get fired from a job a few years ago, and he decided instead to go into policing (he’s a former marine), which is when I realized police aren’t some magical cabal of highly trained individuals. Most people go into policing in the U.S. these days bcz they can’t do anything else.

            That’s a sorry state of policing in my opinion, and much of our issues with police culture stem from that.

            Unfortunately, there’s scientifci data and statistics to back up what I’m saying, and there’s very little data to back up your viewpoint.

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I hate lynch mobs. ACAB and “fuck the police” are lynch mobs based on broad generalizations.

              There is scientific data and statistics to show that black people and others are disproportionately targeted by the police. It’s immediately obvious the police unions protects their own including some folks they likely shouldn’t.

              These are problems we should strive to understand and fix.

              There is not scientific data showing that all cops (or even more than a minority of cops) are bullies out to treat everyone as a suspect or fetishize their next opportunity to beat the crap out of someone. That is an opinion and one that immediately shuts down any hope of a reasonable discussion about how two parties might move forward. Show me one scientific study where someone went “you’re a bastard and you can go fuck yourself” and then got a constructive response… It doesn’t exist, because people do not like being put into groups and told what their own individual opinions must be.

              • juicy@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                ACAB is an earned generalization from day-to-day experience, actual statistics, and media coverage. We’re long past “make nice.” Police need to go. So fuck their feelings.

              • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Why do you keep bringing up lynch mobs? We’re talking about police reform here, it’s necessary. The policing system is rotten to the core. It’s not a few bad apples, or we wouldn’t be having this conversation even.

                • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Look at your behavior. There’s nothing constructive here. There’s no constructive talk about reforms. There’s no proposal for what to do better. There’s no new take or new information. There’s literally nothing of value.

                  It’s just “police bad” and I’m not here for it. I’m talking about lynch mobs because the ACAB crowd is not contributing anything more than a lynch mob would.

                  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Would you like me to make a three page proposal of police reforms in a lemmy comment? There have been a number of reforms proposed. I’m a fan personally of abolishing the dipshit union that protects all police officers. But that’s probably only part what needs to be done.

          • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fuck the police unions? ACUAB? It’s the protection of the unions that allow cops to behave badly and kill people. The unions support the untouchable status of cops for almost every criminal act they commit while on duty. They hide behind the badge while allowing so many bad actors to tarnish it daily.

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I can get behind attacking the police unions and demanding they be reformed (particularly the ones that have a history of protecting abuse of power and excessive force serial offenders). That is more constructive but less catchy (as constructive points usually are).

    • datavoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d guess there are a lot of people who make excuses when getting arrested, and saying you are having a medical emergency is an easy one. If you’re a cop who sees this a lot, you would eventually start assuming everything people say was just an attempt to get pity or leniency.

      The other possibility is that all cops are bastards… But I’m guessing its a mix of the two.