Politicians and dog experts are criticizing South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem after she wrote in a new book about killing a rambunctious puppy. The story — and the vilification she received on social media — has some wondering whether she’s still a viable potential running mate for presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Experts who work with hunting dogs like Noem’s said she should have trained — not killed — the pup, or found other options if the dog was out of control.

Noem has tried to reframe the story from two decades ago as an example of her willingness to make tough decisions. She wrote on social media that the 14-month-old wirehaired pointer named Cricket had shown aggressive behavior by biting.

“As I explained in the book, it wasn’t easy,” she said on X. “But often the easy way isn’t the right way.”

Still, Democrats and even some conservatives have been critical.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    So when politicians support tons of policies that harm, starve, and needlessly incarcerate millions of living American humans, no big deal, but if one fucking dog gets harmed suddenly we give a shit.

    Cool. Our empathy for our fellow man definitely isn’t broken at all.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not hard to understand at all. There’s a couple things at work here: first, humans are terrible at connecting emotionally to long term consequences. That’s why a disaster that kills 100 people will always elicit a stronger reaction than a policy that will kill millions.

      Another thing happening is how humans subconsciously justify things to themselves. An adult could have “deserved” whatever happened, but there’s no way a puppy did.

      I think it’s dogs tickling the same parts of our brains as kids, which would go towards explaining the similar reactions.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Inability to be empathetic and kind to animals is a psychopathic trait. People who don’t want to and wouldn’t hurt humans, wouldn’t hurt animals either. But those who want to hurt humans will usually resort to hurting animals because they can get away with it more easily. (especial treatment for small mammals and pets as they are the emotionally closest to us)

    • Sidyctism@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      The point isnt human vs dog, its direct vs indirect action. People are a lot more disgusted by murderers than the person that put out the hit.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      People kinda suck. I’ve never met a dog I didn’t like. (this is slight sarcasm)