lmao

(also use Linux)

  • Findom_DeLuise [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    95/98/ME was kind of the other way around. 95? Shitty, unstable OS. 95B/SR2? Surprisingly stable, by Win95 standards. 95C/SR2.5? Shitty OS again because of the Internet Explorer integration baked into everything in the fucking shell.

    Same deal with 98 – the initial release was a crash-prone mess, but 98 SE fixed a lot of that through improved hardware support.

    …and then there’s Windows ME, which was just dogshit all around. Love it when my OS decides to optimize a slow-ass PATA disk and corrupt the kernel while doing so.

    (And Vista was just 7 with really nonsensical branding/segmentation, and released for use on hardware that hadn’t caught up yet. Vista Ultimate was legit if you had a beefy enough CPU and tuned a few things in the OS.)