• Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Was a interesting reaction from some in the fediverse stating they would block the BBC instance etc. In reality how welcome are entity’s that are seen as corporate?

    I also cannot understand why the BBC news is not live, possibly they are experimenting with the moderation and management elements. I guess the news feed would get hit harder than Radio 4.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are some on mastodon that want to live in a fairly defensively disconnected/defederated bubble (compared to many other instances or lemmy/kbin).

      And, IMO, that’s totally fine and good … freedom of association gives people and instances that power and it should be embraced when people chose to exercise it TBH, so long as it’s done by admins in a way that isn’t too autocratic against their users and open and transparent.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Iirc, the big instance declaring immediately that it would defederate with them was one that’s very well known for being strict with moderation and had firm rules about anti-trans instances. Because the BBC has a history of being anti-trans, they defederated.

      • darreninthenet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The BBC has a history of being antitrans?

        That’s quite a revelation to me, it has more of a reputation of being extremely liberal and indeed any even remotely right winger here usually whinges and moans about how “woke” it is 🤷🏻‍♂️

        Do you know what in particular triggered their stance that they believed the BBC anti-trans?

          • darreninthenet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thank you for that, most interesting.

            It’s odd given their usually quite liberal stance… I wonder if there some old conservatism creeping in with the Tories being in power for so long…?

            • pqdinfo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Removed as a protest against the community’s support for campaigns to bring about the deaths of members of marginalized groups, and opposition to private entities working to prevent such campaigns, together with it’s mindless flaming and downvoting of anyone who disagrees.

            • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sadly in UK transphobia seems to be pretty common in liberals and liberal institutions. I think that is because in UK the idea to connect transphobia with “womens rights” was really successful and this results in otherwise really liberal / left leaning / feminist individuals & groups to be actively anti-trans. As far as i know even otherwise trust worthy news papers like the guardian plattform anti trans talking points.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s the official broadcaster of TERF island. Even their foremost left wing newspaper is transphobia central.

            • pqdinfo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Removed as a protest against the community’s support for campaigns to bring about the deaths of members of marginalized groups, and opposition to private entities working to prevent such campaigns, together with it’s mindless flaming and downvoting of anyone who disagrees.

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I had no role in the instance’s decision; don’t try to argue against their decision with me. I’ve got no say in it.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a difficult design but generally speaking I don’t think news has an obligation to provide both sides.

          A. They should not run editorials

          B. If they do run editorials presenting both sides is equal to endorsement.

          This isn’t the 1960s where the only way to be heard is via letters to the editor.

      • t0lo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Different presenters can have different positions on issues no?

        • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are lots of people who just want to hear that they are right, that others agree with them. They would rather hang out in an echo chamber where it’s constantly reinforced that their opinions are right rather than hear people who disagree with them.

          Personally I value hearing and understanding why others have different opinions than I do.

      • soviettaters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hate defederation with a passion and I’m close to leaving lemmy.world because of its rash defederating. There is no reason to restrict users based on what the few leaders believe.

        • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most of the defeds I have seen have had pretty serious community interaction prior to the decision. You need to stop seeing admins as leaders. And so does everyone else.

          An admin certainly has some power over their instance, but the users are not locked into that instance at all. They are not telling people what they can see, they are telling people what they are willing to host, or not host.

          Everyone deserves a voice. But nobody is responsible for giving them a megaphone and a box to stand on in their yard.

        • Master@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Go for it. Lemmy accounts are easy to make and itll share the load better.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s very different than a site like Facebook or Twitter banning someone. Nobody is kicking them off the internet… just making sure their own site only shows what they want. If you want to see whatever they defederated with, of course you can go there directly or to another instance.

      • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Socialist as in they send enforcers to your house who have the right to force themselves inside and check how many screens you have got feeding government propaganda into your skull.

        You have to pay a TV licence to be lied to. Pretty sweet.