vegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 9 个月前TikTok sues U.S. government, says ban violates First Amendmentwww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1264arrow-down117
arrow-up1247arrow-down1external-linkTikTok sues U.S. government, says ban violates First Amendmentwww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 9 个月前message-square82fedilink
minus-squareHaus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down7·9 个月前…because corporations are people? Blegh.
minus-squareares35@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·9 个月前wouldn’t it be funny if tiktok ended up overturning citizens united. infinitesimally small chance of it happening, but it would be fucking hilarious.
minus-squareBuelldozer@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·9 个月前Why would it? The US is well able to ban flesh and blood people from the country so the idea that “Corporations are people” fits perfectly well with the ban. In fact it’s entirely consistent behavior.
minus-squareInfynis@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·9 个月前Not the hero we needed, but the one we deserved
minus-squarethemadcodger@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·9 个月前With the way this timeline is shaping up… it wouldn’t surprise me anymore.
…because corporations are people? Blegh.
wouldn’t it be funny if tiktok ended up overturning citizens united. infinitesimally small chance of it happening, but it would be fucking hilarious.
Why would it? The US is well able to ban flesh and blood people from the country so the idea that “Corporations are people” fits perfectly well with the ban. In fact it’s entirely consistent behavior.
Not the hero we needed, but the one we deserved
With the way this timeline is shaping up… it wouldn’t surprise me anymore.