John Brown (1800 - 1859)

Fri May 09, 1800

Image

Image: **


John Brown, born on this day in 1800, was a militant abolitionist who advocated for and practiced armed insurrection to overthrow the system of slavery in the U.S. He became the first American executed for treason after raiding Harpers Ferry.

Brown first gained national attention when he led small groups of volunteers during the Bleeding Kansas crisis of 1856. He was dissatisfied with the pacifism of the organized abolitionist movement, stating “These men are all talk. What we need is action - action!”

In October 1859, Brown led a raid on the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (modern day West Virginia), intending to start a liberation movement that would spread south through the mountainous regions of Virginia and North Carolina.

Although Brown’s group successfully seized the armory at first, his raid was defeated by a combination of volunteer militia and state forces led by Robert E. Lee, who later commanded the Confederate States Army. Seven people were killed, two of whom were Brown’s sons Oliver and Watson, and at least ten more were injured.

Brown had intended to arm enslaved people with weapons from the armory, but only a small number of locals were willing to join him, possibly due to an unfamiliarity with firearms. Within 36 hours, those of Brown’s men who had not fled were killed or captured by local farmers, militiamen, or U.S. Marines.

Brown was hastily tried for treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia, the murder of five men, and inciting a slave insurrection. He was found guilty on all counts and was hanged, becoming the first person executed for treason in the history of the United States.

“I, John Brown, am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land can never be purged away but with blood. I had, as I now think, vainly flattered myself that without very much bloodshed, it might be done.”

- John Brown


  • Rognaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, the guy was right. It needed a lot more blood to fix the issue.

    Unfortunately, I think the current issues with wealth inequality in the US might only end with bloodshed as well.

    • LEX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Last time we had this gilded age issue, we resolved it with minimal widespread violence. Hopefully we can do it again.

      If a few billionaires have to go down along the way though, well, that’s a risk we’re going to have to take.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        minimal widespread violence

        They laid siege to a factory for like a month straight. There was basically a small war that workers only won because the entire community was helping them.

      • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        “The Vanderbilt’s are job creators! Look how many people Mr. Vanderbilt employed while using his vast inheritance to checks notes build a 138,000 sqft mansion for himself. If the Irish don’t feel like they’re being paid fairly, then maybe they just need to go back where they came from.” -Sean Hannity if he were alive in 1885, probably